Literature DB >> 16299584

Use of three-dimensional collagen gels to study mechanotransduction in T47D breast epithelial cells.

Michele A Wozniak1, Patricia J Keely.   

Abstract

Several pathological and disease conditions can alter the mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Conversely, some diseases may arise from changes in the density or rigidity of the ECM. This necessitates the use and development of in vitro models to understand how both biophysical and biochemical signals regulate complex cellular behaviors. T47D breast epithelial cells will differentiate into duct-like tubules when cultured in a floating three-dimensional (3D) collagen gel, but not a 3D collagen gel that is left attached to the culture dish. This paper details several protocols we have developed for analyzing breast cell biology in 3D matrices, including culturing cells in 3D collagen gels, immunostaining cellular structures, and performing biochemical procedures directly from cells embedded in collagen gels.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299584      PMCID: PMC1285185          DOI: 10.1251/bpo112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Proced Online        ISSN: 1480-9222            Impact factor:   3.244


Introduction

Breast epithelial cells in vivo respond to cues from the extracellular matrix (ECM) to differentiate into polarized, growth-arrested, and highly organized multicellular structures that form a functional tissue (Fig. 1A). During cancer progression, however, cells lose their normal interactions with the ECM and breast structure is compromised as cells de-differentiate, proliferate, and migrate (Fig. 1B and C). A leading risk factor for breast carcinoma is increased breast density, which accounts for approximately 30% of breast cancers (1). Dense breast tissue is characterized by an increased deposition of ECM proteins and fibroblasts in the stroma surrounding the epithelial cells. An increase in breast density leads to a four to six-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer (1). However, the mechanisms by which stromal density could promote breast carcinoma are unknown.
Fig. 1

Normal and cancerous breast morphology.

A) Diagram showing the normal organization of ducts and acini in the human breast. The cross-section demonstrates luminal epithelial cells aligned in a polar manner so their apical side faces and surrounds the lumen. The luminal epithelial cells are surrounded by a non-continuous layer of myoepithelial cells. Surrounding these cells is the basement membrane. Fibroblasts align the basement membrane and this entire structure is surrounded by the stroma, which is predominantly, but not exclusively, composed of type I collagen. B) During ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the normal polar organization of the luminal epithelial cells is lost, as these cells de-differentiate and proliferate. The cross-section shows the epithelial cells completely filling the lumen. In less severe cases of DCIS, the luminal epithelial cells do not completely block the lumen. In DCIS, the transformed epithelial cells do not cross the basement membrane, but remain within the duct. C) DCIS sometimes leads to invasive, or infiltrating, carcinoma, in which the epithelial cells migrate and invade through the basement membrane and into the surrounding stroma.

In order to study the molecular mechanisms by which breast cells become transformed, tissue culture cell lines are often used because they are homogenous, can be genetically altered, and allow for large harvests of cells for biochemical procedures. However, when breast cell lines are cultured on normal tissue culture two-dimensional (2D) surfaces, they do not recapitulate the differentiated structures seen in vivo. It was therefore recognized that in vitro three-dimensional (3D) model systems were needed in order to study breast epithelial biology in a more relevant context (2, 3). Since then, several excellent in vitro systems have been designed for studying breast cell behavior and tumorigenesis in a three-dimensional context. These include primary mouse epithelial cells in/on collagen gels (2-5) or on reconstituted basement membrane (6), normal murine mammary gland (NMuMG) cells in collagen gels (7), nonmalignant HMT-3522 S-1 breast cells and their tumorigenic progeny HMT-3522 T4-2 cells in reconstituted basement membrane (8-10), MCF-10A breast epithelial cells in Matrigel (11), and many others.

Normal and cancerous breast morphology.

A) Diagram showing the normal organization of ducts and acini in the human breast. The cross-section demonstrates luminal epithelial cells aligned in a polar manner so their apical side faces and surrounds the lumen. The luminal epithelial cells are surrounded by a non-continuous layer of myoepithelial cells. Surrounding these cells is the basement membrane. Fibroblasts align the basement membrane and this entire structure is surrounded by the stroma, which is predominantly, but not exclusively, composed of type I collagen. B) During ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the normal polar organization of the luminal epithelial cells is lost, as these cells de-differentiate and proliferate. The cross-section shows the epithelial cells completely filling the lumen. In less severe cases of DCIS, the luminal epithelial cells do not completely block the lumen. In DCIS, the transformed epithelial cells do not cross the basement membrane, but remain within the duct. C) DCIS sometimes leads to invasive, or infiltrating, carcinoma, in which the epithelial cells migrate and invade through the basement membrane and into the surrounding stroma. Each of these systems promotes breast cell differentiation in vitro. The selection of a 3D system should be based on which one will best address the questions to be studied. In our case, there are two main features we desired in a 3D model system. First, given that invasive ductal carcinoma is the most common type of breast cancer, we want to study the formation and disruption of ductal morphogenesis. Thus, we need a cell line that recapitulates ductal structures and we need to culture the cells in an appropriate ECM protein to support the formation of ducts. Although the T47D breast cell line originates from an invasive ductal carcinoma, it is classified as a well-differentiated cell line (12). In addition, T47D cells retain the ability to differentiate into duct-like tubules when cultured in floating 3D collagen gels (13). Type I collagen, type IV collagen, and laminin are abundant components of the ECM and basement membrane in the breast, with type I collagen being the predominant structural component of connective tissue. The use of type I collagen gels instead of Matrigel was best for our model for several reasons. First, type I collagen is localized around the mouse (14) and human (15) mammary ducts, suggesting a physiological relevance for collagen in the development and maintenance of these structures. Laminin and type IV collagen (components of Matrigel), however, are more abundant around alveoli and the growing terminal endbuds of the mouse mammary gland (14) and around the acini in human breast (16). Based on this data, it is not surprising that the culture of breast epithelial cells in Matrigel normally promotes the formation of cyst-like, acinar structures (11, 17). For these reasons, culturing cells in type I collagen better supports the in vitro ductal environment. The second feature we desired in a 3D system was the manipulation of the physical properties of the matrix in order to study mechanotransduction. Mechanosensing is defined as the ability of a cell or tissue to detect, and respond to, the imposition of force (18). Mechanotransduction refers to the ability of a cell to transform mechanical signals into biochemical signals (18). For these purposes, collagen was again advantageous because one can physically detach a collagen gel to impose a different mechanical environment on the cells, compared to a gel that is left attached to the culture dish (19, 20). In addition, one can easily alter the density of 3D collagen gels by changing the concentration of collagen (21, 22). Conversely, Matrigel is too pliable and yielding for these experiments and does not lend itself to simple manipulation of density. In addition, type I collagen is the key determinant of tensile properties in connective tissue (21), indicating that type I collagen regulates the mechanical properties of connective tissue. The observation that type I collagen is abundant around ductal structures (14, 15) further supports the notion that type I collagen regulates the in vivo biophysical properties of the ECM surrounding the ducts. Thus, the choice to culture cells in 3D gels composed of type I collagen satisfied both the biological and mechanical parameters of our model. The purpose of this paper is to explain the methods we have developed to study T47D breast epithelial cell morphogenesis and signal transduction in 3D collagen gels. We will also discuss the difficulties and intricacies of working with this 3D model system.

Materials and Methods

Collagen gel culture

T47D breast epithelial cells were maintained and cultured in type I collagen gels at a final concentration of 1.3mg/ml, with 1 x 105 cells/ml cultured per gel, as previously described (13). One day after the gels were poured, one set of gels was left attached to the dish and one set of gels was detached from the sides and bottom of the dish (these gels are referred to as “floating”). Media was added to the gels at this time. The gels were fed approximately every four days. Cells were grown for seven to ten days, and phase contrast pictures taken to assess morphology using a Nikon 35mm camera attached to a TE300 Nikon inverted microscope. Detailed methods for T47D cell general maintenance and collagen gel culture are listed in Protocols 1 and 2, respectively.

Rho activity assays and immunoprecipitations

Subconfluent T47D cells were harvested in 0.5mM EDTA in PBS, resuspended in 5mg/ml fatty acid free BSA (IMP Biomedicals) in RPMI, and approximately 15-20 x 106 cells used for each condition to be analyzed. Conditions we typically use are: no collagen, culture on a collagen-coated petri plate (60-100mm) ("2D"), and culture in attached or floating 3D collagen gels. For culture in 3D gels, the gels were made with BSA/RPMI instead of full T47D media in order to determine the effect of collagen alone on the cells, in the absence of serum. (However, we have also performed assays in the presence of serum). Gels were allowed to polymerize for one hour at 37°C before 1ml BSA/RPMI was added to the gels and the gels rendered floating in BSA/RPMI or left attached to the culture dish. The gels were then incubated for another hour. After this incubation, the activity assay or immunoprecipitation was performed. For the Rho activity assay, cells in gels were lysed in TBS buffer containing 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and sodium pervanadate. RBD-GST pull down assays were performed as described (22) and detailed protocols are included as Protocols 6-8. Samples were run on a SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and the membrane was probed with anti-Rho (Santa Cruz, 1:250) followed by anti-mouse HRP (Jackson Immunolabs, 1:5000). Rho was detected using ECL substrate (Amersham Biosciences). For immunoprecipitations, 4 μg antibody and 25 μl GammaBind Beads (Amersham Biosciences) were added to the cleared cell lysate and rotated, at 4°C, for two hours to overnight, depending on which antibody used. Samples were run on a SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Immunoblotting from lysates and immunoprecipitaton methods are detailed in Protocols 4 and 5, respectively.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were grown in collagen gels for seven to ten days. The gels were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature, washed for 10 minutes with PBS while shaking, and then incubated in 0.15M glycine in PBS for 10 minutes. After washing again with PBS for 10 minutes, 0.02% Triton X-100 in PBS was added for 10 minutes. The gels were washed with PBS for 10 minutes and then blocked overnight at 4°C with 1% fatty acid free BSA, 1% donkey serum in PBS. The gels were then soaked in 100 ml primary antibody diluted in PBS with 1% donkey serum for 30 minutes at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After extensive washing in PBS, 100 ml secondary antibody and 1% donkey serum in PBS was added for 30 minutes at room temperature. The gels were washed twice in PBS for 10 minutes, in water for 10 minutes, and mounted on a slide with Prolong Antifade mounting medium (Molecular Probes). Immunostaining was analyzed by epifluorescence using a TE300 Nikon inverted microscope equipped with a Photometrics CoolSnap fx CCD camera. Images were collected and 3D deconvolution performed using Inovision software. This method is detailed in Protocol 3.

Results and Discussion

Morphogenesis and characterization of T47D cells

The methods described here use T47D breast epithelial cells. However, these protocols can be used for other cell types cultured in collagen gels and, we anticipate, for cells cultured in other 3D matrices as well. The T47D cell line was originally isolated from a 54 year old female patient with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Although the cells will form colonies in soft agar (23, 24), they are weakly tumorigenic in mice ((25) and our unpublished observations). These cells are classified as a well-differentiated cell line since they are estrogen receptor-positive (26) and retain the ability to form organized structures in 3D ECM (13). When T47D cells are grown on 2D tissue culture plastic, they proliferate, migrate, and do not differentiate (Fig. 2). Grown at low confluency, these cells will spread to develop focal adhesions and various actin structures, such as lamellipodia and stress fibers. When the cells are grown to greater confluency, they show a more epithelial-like cobblestone morphology (Fig. 2), although not to the extent of other “normal” breast cell lines.
Fig. 2

T47D breast epithelial cell morphology.

T47D cells differentiate into tubules when cultured in a floating 3D collagen gel for seven days, but not when cultured in an attached collagen gel, or when cultured on a 2D surface (at low or high confluency). Scale bar, 100 μm.

T47D breast epithelial cell morphology.

T47D cells differentiate into tubules when cultured in a floating 3D collagen gel for seven days, but not when cultured in an attached collagen gel, or when cultured on a 2D surface (at low or high confluency). Scale bar, 100 μm. T47D cells cultured in a 3D type I collagen gel become mechanically loaded and develop isometric tension because the matrix is restrained and can resist the force exerted on it by the cells (19, 20, 27, 28). Cells grown in the 3D gels attached to the culture dish will not form differentiated structures (Fig. 2), and will continue to proliferate (22). However, if this gel is released, the cells become mechanically unloaded because the matrix can no longer resist the force exerted on it by the cells (19, 20). The collagen gel is contracted by the cells, and the cells decrease proliferation (22) and undergo tubulogenesis (Fig. 2). We describe this as tubulogenesis, and not simply a clustering of cells, because T47D cells that form these structures display lumens that stain with an antibody against the human milk fat globule, as described previously (13). T47D tubule formation in floating collagen gels occurs as single cells proliferate to form a branched structure. Single cells do not migrate towards each other to form tubules, as suggested by the observation that adding more cells to a floating collagen gel does not result in faster tubule formation (13). In addition, we have tracked single cells in a floating collagen gel over seven days to confirm that cells grow into, rather than coalesce into, tubule structures (Fig. 3). This observation is significant because both human and murine mammary gland development proceeds in this manner, by the outward growth of terminal end buds into the mammary fat pad (reviewed in (29, 30)).
Fig. 3

Development of T47D tubules from single cells.

T47D cells were cultured in a floating 1.3 mg/ml 3D collagen gel. Every day for seven days, the same gel location was identified and photographed. T47D cells grow into tubules—they do not cluster together to form tubule structures. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Development of T47D tubules from single cells.

T47D cells were cultured in a floating 1.3 mg/ml 3D collagen gel. Every day for seven days, the same gel location was identified and photographed. T47D cells grow into tubules—they do not cluster together to form tubule structures. Scale bar, 100 μm. Differentiation primarily in floating collagen gels (vs. attached) is not a T47D cell-line specific phenomenon. MCF10-A and NMuMG breast epithelial cell lines and primary mouse and rat breast epithelial cells also form differentiated structures in floating, but not attached, 3D collagen gels. Moreover, all of these breast epithelial cells contract a floating collagen gel (2-4, 22), further supporting the theory that differentiation requires cellular contractility. It was also observed that human breast luminal epithelial cells taken from primary cultures form inside-out acinar-like structures in attached collagen gels (31), again suggesting that culture in an attached collagen gel does not support proper breast differentiation. Interestingly, addition of laminin or breast myoepithelial cells to the luminal cells in an attached collagen gel promotes proper acinar differentiation (31). Because primary breast epithelial cells can polarize and differentiate when cultured in a floating 3D collagen gel, and indeed can deposit a basement membrane (2, 3, 5), these observations suggest that changes in the physical properties of a collagen gel may also regulate signal transduction pathways controlling ECM deposition. The deposited ECM could then direct consequent cell polarization and differentiation in a floating collagen gel. As mentioned above, an increase in breast stromal density is a risk factor for breast carcinoma, suggesting that breast cells respond to mechanical cues in their ECM in vivo. This system proved useful to determine if changes in collagen density alone, without stromal fibroblasts and growth factors, could alter breast cell behavior. This question was addressed by culturing cells in 3D gels of varying collagen concentrations, which has been shown to vary collagen density (21). Cells cultured in floating high-density collagen gels showed disrupted tubulogenesis (22) and increased proliferation (unpublished data) in a manner similar to cells cultured in attached, lower density (1.3mg/ml) 3D collagen gels. Using this 3D system, we have also found that the ECM does not simply “set up” breast cells for differentiation or proliferation. Rather, breast cells are continually sensing and responding to the mechanical properties of the ECM. For example, cells that have been cultured in an attached collagen gel for days do not form tubules. However, if the same gel is detached from the dish, the cells will begin to form tubules within 24 hours (unpublished data), suggesting breast cells are constantly relaying information to and from the ECM. In addition, inhibitors of contractility, such as inhibitors of Rho, ROCK, or myosin, added to already-formed tubules in floating 3D collagen gels will disrupt tubule structure ((22) and unpublished data). We have proposed that T47D breast cells continually sense changes in their environment through the ability to contract the surrounding ECM, which alters cell signaling events regulating proliferation and differentiation.

Immunofluorescent staining of breast cells in 3D collagen gels

In order to visualize the localization of specific proteins and structures, cells 3D matrices are often snap frozen and cryosectioned for immunostaining. We originally tried this approach, but found that the ductual structures were damaged from the sectioning. The tubules formed by T47D cells are not that large (about 50 μm cross-section of a duct); however, the ducts themselves are long (from 300-1000 μm in length) and we did not want to compromise this structure. Therefore, the immunofluorescent staining protocol we have designed for cells in 3D collagen gels does not require cryosectioning and is a modification to protocols used for cells cultured on 2D surfaces. There are several factors to take into consideration when immunostaining breast cells in a 3D collagen gel, the most important being that fixation solutions and antibodies must reach cellular structures embedded in the collagen gel. An advantage of working with collagen gels is that solutions and molecules can diffuse through collagen rather easily. One step we have taken to ensure specific staining with little background is to considerably increase washing times. In between each fixing and permeabilization step, the gels are washed with PBS for 10 minutes, with agitation, and after antibody treatment, the gels are washed extensively (30 minutes up to overnight). Another modification we have made is to block the cells overnight at 4°C. This greatly helps to decrease non-specific staining. For some antibodies that still show high background, we found that background fluorescence could be reduced by staining overnight at 4°C, instead of 30 minutes at room temperature, and increasing washing time after antibody treatment. Using this protocol, we have found that focal adhesion formation is down-regulated in cells in floating 3D collagen gels (Fig. 4) (22). This procedure can be used not only to determine the localization of molecules, but also to assess other cellular behaviors, such as proliferation. For example, we have used this procedure to immunostain for Ki67, a protein required for cell cycle progression (32), in order to determine the relative proliferation of cells in floating vs. attached collagen gels and have found that cells in floating gels have reduced proliferation (22).
Fig. 4

Immunostaining T47D breast cells cultured in 3D collagen gels.

Cells were cultured in attached or floating 3D collagen gels and seven days later, the gels were immunostained with anti-paxillin as detailed in the protocols. Using this procedure, we have observed that cells in floating collagen gels down-regulate focal adhesion formation (see insets for more detail). Note that although it appears that cells are in a single plane, this is an optical section of the 3D structures formed by T47D cells. Scale bar, 25 μm.

Immunostaining T47D breast cells cultured in 3D collagen gels.

Cells were cultured in attached or floating 3D collagen gels and seven days later, the gels were immunostained with anti-paxillin as detailed in the protocols. Using this procedure, we have observed that cells in floating collagen gels down-regulate focal adhesion formation (see insets for more detail). Note that although it appears that cells are in a single plane, this is an optical section of the 3D structures formed by T47D cells. Scale bar, 25 μm.

Biochemical procedures in breast cells cultured in 3D collagen gels

In order to determine the signaling events that are regulated in cells in floating vs. attached 3D collagen gels, it is necessary to perform biochemistry in cells cultured in 3D matrices. There are three major considerations to take into account when performing biochemical procedures in cells cultured in 3D collagen gels. The first is that the cells are embedded, and not on top of, a 3D matrix. Collagenase can be used to digest the collagen and collect the cells. However, collagenase digestion takes approximately 30 minutes and sensitive signaling events, such as phosphorylation, would likely not be retained within this time period. Therefore, cells need to by lysed rapidly while embedded in a collagen gel. We developed a protocol to allow the collagen gel to polymerize into a gel around the cells for an hour, then render the gels floating or attached for one hour. A one hour time point was chosen in order to look at early signaling events regulated in response to physical changes in the ECM. At this time, the entire collagen gel can be lysed with 2X lysis buffer and pipetted to break apart the gel. Much collagen protein is retained in the lysate, which would interfere with protein quantitation. However, because equal numbers of cells are cultured in the gels at the beginning of the experiment and the cells are only in the collagen gel for two hours, additional protein quantitation and standardization is not needed. After the cells are lysed in the gel and the lysate is cleared by centrifugation, standard biochemical procedures such as GST-pulldown assays and immunoprecipitations can be performed (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Performing biochemical procedures directly from lysed T47D cells cultured in 3D collagen gels.

Cells were cultured in attached or floating 3D collagen gels for one hour and a FAK/PI3-K co-immunoprecipitation performed as detailed in the protocols. Association between FAK and PI3-K is decreased in cells cultured in floating 3D collagen gels.

Performing biochemical procedures directly from lysed T47D cells cultured in 3D collagen gels.

Cells were cultured in attached or floating 3D collagen gels for one hour and a FAK/PI3-K co-immunoprecipitation performed as detailed in the protocols. Association between FAK and PI3-K is decreased in cells cultured in floating 3D collagen gels. A second consideration when performing biochemical procedures in 3D collagen gels is volume. Pulldown assays and immunoprecipitations are normally performed in a total volume of under 1 ml lysate. However, the volume of the collagen gel is 1 ml, and addition of an equal volume of 2X lysis buffer makes the total volume 2 ml. We originally tried pouring smaller collagen gels (i.e., 0.5 ml), but they fell apart easily and the floating gels had a tendency to reattach to the dish. Therefore, 6-well plates were used and the gel volume was kept at 1ml. Finally, because the total volume of the lysate is twice the volume normally used, the amount of protein, and thus the number of cells, must be increased. For an immunoprecipitation, we typically use 7-10 million cells per condition, whereas a pulldown assay requires 15-20 million cells. These numbers can vary and the minimum number of cells that can be used should be determined for each pulldown/immunoprecipitation. Because so many cells are necessary, cells can only be cultured for a maximum of 24 hours. (Such a large number of cells would outgrow the gel in a few days). Therefore, because a large number of cells are used for these assays, we currently cannot analyze later signaling events (at a few days, for example). Biochemical analyses require many more cells than are typically used for morphogenesis studies. Therefore, an important consideration is that there may be differences in cell:cell junctions compared to collagen gels with fewer cells. However, we believe this is a valid way to analyze the difference in biochemical interactions because signaling changes are observed between cells in floating and attached 3D gels (Fig. 4 and (%R[22}%)) that are consistent with morphogenesis and immunostaining results. We are currently investigating the use of ELISA-based assays in order to analyze biochemical events. The advantage of the ELISA is that less protein (and thus less cells) can be used, which will allow one to directly compare tubulogenesis with biochemical events. In addition, using ELISA-based assays, we anticipate the ability to analyze signaling events that occur later in the differentiation process. In conclusion, this paper has described methods used to analyze signal transduction in T47D breast epithelial cells cultured in 3D collagen gels. As it is becoming more apparent that signal transduction differs for cells cultured in 3D matrices as compared to 2D conditions, these approaches will likely become more regularly used and adjusted as technology advances.
Table 1

Successfully used antibodies

Antibody / Stain Species Supplier Time Dilution
α-actininMouseSigma30 min1:100
Bisbenzimiden/aSigma(with 2°)1:1000
FAKMouse, clone 4.47Upstate30 min1:200
Ki67RabbitZymed30 min1:80
PaxillinMouseTransduction Labso/n1:100
Phalloidinn/aJackson Immunolabs(with 2°)1:1000
Phospho-FAK Y397RabbitBiosource30 min1:100
Phospho-Src Y416RabbitBiosourceo/n1:100
TalinMouseSigma30 min1:500
TensinMouseTransduction Labso/n1:100
VinculinMouseSigma30 min1:400
  32 in total

Review 1.  Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading.

Authors:  F Grinnell
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 2.  Ki67 protein: the immaculate deception?

Authors:  D C Brown; K C Gatter
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure.

Authors:  Blayne A Roeder; Klod Kokini; Jennifer E Sturgis; J Paul Robinson; Sherry L Voytik-Harbin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices.

Authors:  Frederick Grinnell
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures.

Authors:  Jayanta Debnath; Senthil K Muthuswamy; Joan S Brugge
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 6.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Rapid development of tamoxifen-stimulated mutant p53 breast tumors (T47D) in athymic mice.

Authors:  J M Schafer; E S Lee; R M O'Regan; K Yao; V C Jordan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Human breast development.

Authors:  B A Howard; B A Gusterson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  ErbB2, but not ErbB1, reinitiates proliferation and induces luminal repopulation in epithelial acini.

Authors:  S K Muthuswamy; D Li; S Lelievre; M J Bissell; J S Brugge
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Normal and tumor-derived myoepithelial cells differ in their ability to interact with luminal breast epithelial cells for polarity and basement membrane deposition.

Authors:  Thorarinn Gudjonsson; Lone Rønnov-Jessen; René Villadsen; Fritz Rank; Mina J Bissell; Ole William Petersen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  46 in total

1.  Cancer cell stiffness: integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential.

Authors:  Erin L Baker; Jing Lu; Dihua Yu; Roger T Bonnecaze; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A 3-D cell culture system to study epithelia functions using microcarriers.

Authors:  Petra H Jakob; Jessica Kehrer; Peter Flood; Catharina Wiegel; Uta Haselmann; Markus Meissner; Ernst H K Stelzer; Emmanuel G Reynaud
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Preadipocytes stimulate ductal morphogenesis and functional differentiation of human mammary epithelial cells on 3D silk scaffolds.

Authors:  Xiuli Wang; Xiaohui Zhang; Lin Sun; Balajikarthick Subramanian; Maricel V Maffini; Ana Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  An adaptable hydrogel array format for 3-dimensional cell culture and analysis.

Authors:  Leenaporn Jongpaiboonkit; William J King; Gary E Lyons; Amy L Paguirigan; Jay W Warrick; David J Beebe; William L Murphy
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  A complex 3D human tissue culture system based on mammary stromal cells and silk scaffolds for modeling breast morphogenesis and function.

Authors:  Xiuli Wang; Lin Sun; Maricel V Maffini; Ana Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  A549 and MRC-5 cell aggregation in a microfluidic Lab-on-a-chip system.

Authors:  A Zuchowska; E Jastrzebska; K Zukowski; M Chudy; A Dybko; Z Brzozka
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 7.  Progesterone receptors (PR) mediate STAT actions: PR and prolactin receptor signaling crosstalk in breast cancer models.

Authors:  Katherine A Leehy; Thu H Truong; Laura J Mauro; Carol A Lange
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 4.292

8.  Stiff collagen matrices increase tumorigenic prolactin signaling in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Craig E Barcus; Patricia J Keely; Kevin W Eliceiri; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Hormonal regulation of epithelial organization in a three-dimensional breast tissue culture model.

Authors:  Lucia Speroni; Gregory S Whitt; Joanna Xylas; Kyle P Quinn; Adeline Jondeau-Cabaton; Clifford Barnes; Irene Georgakoudi; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.056

10.  Stiffened Extracellular Matrix and Signaling from Stromal Fibroblasts via Osteoprotegerin Regulate Tumor Cell Invasion in a 3-D Tumor in Situ Model.

Authors:  Joshua S McLane; Lee A Ligon
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2016-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.