Literature DB >> 16299435

Continuity of care practices and substance use disorder patients' engagement in continuing care.

Jeanne A Schaefer1, Erin Ingudomnukul, Alex H S Harris, Ruth C Cronkite.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substance use disorder (SUD) patients who engage in more continuing care have better outcomes, but information on practices associated with greater patient engagement and retention in continuing care remains elusive.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine if staff's continuity of care practices predict patients' engagement in continuing care in the 6 months after discharge from intensive SUD treatment and to determine if the impact of continuity of care practices on patients' engagement in continuing care differs for patients treated in inpatient/residential versus outpatient programs. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Staff in 28 Veterans Affairs (VA) intensive SUD treatment programs with varying continuity of care practices provided data on 878 patients' alcohol and drug problems at treatment entry. At discharge, staff provided data on patients' motivation, treatment intensity, and on the continuity of care practices they used with each patient. VA administrative databases supplied data on patients' subsequent engagement in continuing care. Mixed-effects modeling was used to examine predictors of patients' engagement in care.
RESULTS: Patients in outpatient programs who received more continuity of care engaged in continuing care significantly longer. More highly motivated outpatients, those with fewer alcohol problems at treatment entry, and patients who used VA services in the year before treatment also remained in continuing care longer. These findings did not hold for patients treated in inpatient/residential programs.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of care practices predicted engagement in continuing care only for patients treated in outpatient SUD programs. More research is needed to identify effective continuity of care practices for patients treated in inpatient/residential programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299435     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000185736.45129.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  Agency-level financial incentives and electronic reminders to improve continuity of care after discharge from residential treatment and detoxification.

Authors:  Andrea Acevedo; Margaret T Lee; Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Grant A Ritter; Lee Panas; Kevin Campbell; Jason Bean-Mortinson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Causes, consequences, and prevention of burnout among substance abuse treatment counselors: a rural versus urban comparison.

Authors:  Carrie B Oser; Elizabeth P Biebel; Erin Pullen; Kathi L H Harp
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

3.  Would You Be Surprised If This Patient Died This Year? Advance Care Planning in Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Michelle J Fleshner; Amy J Kennedy; Peter J Veldkamp; Julie W Childers
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Social network correlates of participation in telephone continuing care for alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Deborah H A Van Horn; Lior Rennert; Kevin G Lynch; James R McKay
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 5.  Continuing care research: what we have learned and where we are going.

Authors:  James R McKay
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-03

Review 6.  Continuing care in the treatment of addictive disorders.

Authors:  James R McKay
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.081

7.  Health Care Processes Contributing to Suicide Risk in Veterans During and After Residential Substance Abuse Treatment.

Authors:  Natalie B Riblet; Lauren Kenneally; Brian Shiner; Bradley V Watts
Journal:  J Dual Diagn       Date:  2019-06-28

Review 8.  Treating alcoholism as a chronic disease: approaches to long-term continuing care.

Authors:  James R McKay; Susanne Hiller-Sturmhofel
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2011

9.  Evaluating the feasibility and impact of case rate payment for recovery support navigator services: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maria E Torres; Mary Brolin; Lee Panas; Grant Ritter; Dominic Hodgkin; Margaret Lee; Elizabeth Merrick; Constance Horgan; Jonna C Hopwood; Andrea Gewirtz; Natasha De Marco; Nancy Lane
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Machine learning prediction of dropping out of outpatients with alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  So Jin Park; Sun Jung Lee; HyungMin Kim; Jae Kwon Kim; Ji-Won Chun; Soo-Jung Lee; Hae Kook Lee; Dai Jin Kim; In Young Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.