Literature DB >> 16299191

An audit of clinical practice in the management of head injured patients following the introduction of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommendations.

J Kerr1, R Smith, S Gray, D Beard, C E Robertson.   

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG) in A&E of Edinburgh Royal Infirmary to examine clinical practices in the management of head injured patients pre- and post-inception of the SIGN guidelines published in August 2000.1607 patients attended the department in two separate one month periods at equal intervals pre- and post-guidelines publication. The majority of patients with a SIGN indication for admission were admitted (93% pre- and 92% post-guidelines). For skull x ray (SXR) requests, in the pre-guidelines group, 92% of admitted patients with a SIGN indication for x ray had a SXR: this figure dropped to 79% post-guidelines. 36% of patients with a SIGN indication for CT actually had a scan pre-guidelines: this figure increased to 64% post-guidelines.57% of patients pre-guidelines and 44% of patients post-guidelines were discharged from A&E in accordance with the SIGN recommendations. Of patients admitted for neurological observations, this increased from 50% pre- to 88% post-guidelines. Of patients who were discharged "inappropriately", only one re-presented and was subsequently admitted but required no neurosurgical intervention. Despite publication of the SIGN guidelines and positive reinforcement in A&E and at ward level, practice has not changed significantly. Where our practice did not adhere to SIGN recommendations, there was no untoward sequelae. For published national guidelines to be effective, a formal audit structure with regular feedback is necessary to ensure a continued change in clinical practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299191      PMCID: PMC1726649          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.022673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

1.  The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G A Wells; K Vandemheen; C Clement; H Lesiuk; A Laupacis; R D McKnight; R Verbeek; R Brison; D Cass; M E Eisenhauer; G Greenberg; J Worthington
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Epidemiology of head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Thornhill; G M Teasdale; G D Murray; J McEwen; C W Roy; K I Penny
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-17

4.  Management of head-injured patients in the emergency department: a practical protocol.

Authors:  C Arienta; M Caroli; S Balbi
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1997-09

5.  The work of a regional head injury service.

Authors:  J D Miller; P A Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Management of minor head injuries in the accident and emergency department: the effect of an observation ward.

Authors:  S R Brown; C Raine; C E Robertson; I J Swann
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1994-09

7.  Head injuries at an inner city accident and emergency department.

Authors:  I J Swann; R MacMillan; I Strong
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Head injuries in accident and emergency departments at Scottish hospitals.

Authors:  I Strang; R MacMillan; B Jennett
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  The causes and consequences of minor head injury in the elderly.

Authors:  C W Roy; B Pentland; J D Miller
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Patients with a head injury who "talk and die" in the 1990s.

Authors:  Laurence T Dunn; Michael O Fitzpatrick; Diana Beard; Jennifer M Henry
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2003-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Latency of guideline effects: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and other contributors to head injury management.

Authors:  Dietmar H Borchert; Willem Schenk; Alain Sauvage
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.

Authors:  Emma J Tavender; Marije Bosch; Russell L Gruen; Sally E Green; Susan Michie; Sue E Brennan; Jill J Francis; Jennie L Ponsford; Jonathan C Knott; Sue Meares; Tracy Smyth; Denise A O'Connor
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Guidelines: is bigger better? A review of SIGN guidelines.

Authors:  A Gordon Baird; James R Lawrence
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Understanding practice: the factors that influence management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department--a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Emma J Tavender; Marije Bosch; Russell L Gruen; Sally E Green; Jonathan Knott; Jill J Francis; Susan Michie; Denise A O'Connor
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Impact of the SIGN head injury guidelines and NHS 4-hour emergency target on hospital admissions for head injury in Scotland: an interrupted times series.

Authors:  Carl Marincowitz; Fiona E Lecky; Eleanor Morris; Victoria Allgar; Trevor A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.