AIM: Some retrospective studies have shown a lack of benefit of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient colorectal cancer. Our aim was to assess if this molecular marker can predict benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy. A second objective was to determine if MMR status influences short term survival. METHODS: We included 754 patients with a median follow up of 728.5 days (range 1-1097). A total of 260 patients with stage II or III tumours received 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy, according to standard clinical criteria and irrespective of their MMR status. A tumour was considered MMR deficient when either BAT-26 showed instability or there was loss of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression. RESULTS: At the end of the follow up period, 206 patients died and 120 presented with tumour recurrence. Sixty six (8.8%) patients had MMR deficient tumours. There were no significant differences in overall survival (MMR competent 72.1%; MMR deficient 78.8%; p = 0.3) or disease free survival (MMR competent 61.3%; MMR deficient 72.3%; p = 0.08). In patients with stage II and III tumours, benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to patients with MMR competent tumours (overall survival: chemotherapy 87.1%; non-chemotherapy 73.5%; log rank, p = 0.00001). Patients with MMR deficient tumours did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (overall survival: chemotherapy 89.5%; non-chemotherapy 82.4%; log rank, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy depends on the MMR status of tumours in patients with colorectal cancer. 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with MMR competent tumours but this benefit from chemotherapy cannot be extended to patients with MMR deficient tumours.
AIM: Some retrospective studies have shown a lack of benefit of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with mismatch repair (MMR) deficient colorectal cancer. Our aim was to assess if this molecular marker can predict benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy. A second objective was to determine if MMR status influences short term survival. METHODS: We included 754 patients with a median follow up of 728.5 days (range 1-1097). A total of 260 patients with stage II or III tumours received 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy, according to standard clinical criteria and irrespective of their MMR status. A tumour was considered MMR deficient when either BAT-26 showed instability or there was loss of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression. RESULTS: At the end of the follow up period, 206 patients died and 120 presented with tumour recurrence. Sixty six (8.8%) patients had MMR deficient tumours. There were no significant differences in overall survival (MMR competent 72.1%; MMR deficient 78.8%; p = 0.3) or disease free survival (MMR competent 61.3%; MMR deficient 72.3%; p = 0.08). In patients with stage II and III tumours, benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to patients with MMR competent tumours (overall survival: chemotherapy 87.1%; non-chemotherapy 73.5%; log rank, p = 0.00001). Patients with MMR deficient tumours did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (overall survival: chemotherapy 89.5%; non-chemotherapy 82.4%; log rank, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Benefit from 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy depends on the MMR status of tumours in patients with colorectal cancer. 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with MMR competent tumours but this benefit from chemotherapy cannot be extended to patients with MMR deficient tumours.
Authors: T Watanabe; T T Wu; P J Catalano; T Ueki; R Satriano; D G Haller; A B Benson; S R Hamilton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: I González-García; V Moreno; M Navarro; J Martí-Ragué; E Marcuello; C Benasco; O Campos; G Capellà; M A Peinado Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-04-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: N Wolmark; H Rockette; E Mamounas; J Jones; S Wieand; D L Wickerham; H D Bear; J N Atkins; N V Dimitrov; A G Glass; E R Fisher; B Fisher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C M Wright; O F Dent; M Barker; R C Newland; P H Chapuis; E L Bokey; J P Young; B A Leggett; J R Jass; G A Macdonald Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: A Loukola; K Eklin; P Laiho; R Salovaara; P Kristo; H Järvinen; J P Mecklin; V Launonen; L A Aaltonen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C G Moertel; T R Fleming; J S Macdonald; D G Haller; J A Laurie; C M Tangen; J S Ungerleider; W A Emerson; D C Tormey; J H Glick; M H Veeder; J A Mailliard Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1995-03-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Aparna Mukherjee; Thomas J McGarrity; Francesca Ruggiero; Walter Koltun; Kevin McKenna; Lisa Poritz; Maria J Baker Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 2.857
Authors: Rodrigo Jover; Thuy-Phuong Nguyen; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Pedro Zapater; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda; Estefanía Rojas; Joaquín Cubiella; Francesc Balaguer; Juan D Morillas; Juan Clofent; Luis Bujanda; Josep M Reñé; Xavier Bessa; Rosa M Xicola; David Nicolás-Pérez; Antoni Castells; Montserrat Andreu; Xavier Llor; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Long Shan Li; Julio C Morales; Martina Veigl; David Sedwick; Sheldon Greer; Mark Meyers; Mark Wagner; Richard Fishel; David A Boothman Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 8.739