Literature DB >> 16298668

The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres.

Debra L Long1, Kathleen Baynes, Chantel S Prat.   

Abstract

Readers construct at least two interrelated representations when they comprehend a text: (a) a representation of the explicit ideas in a text and the relations among them (i.e., a propositional representation) and (b) a representation of the context or situation to which a text refers (i.e., a discourse model). In a recent study, found evidence that readers' representations were structured according to propositional relations, but only in the left hemisphere. Both hemispheres, however, appeared to represent contextually relevant semantic information. The goal in the current study was to examine further the organization of explicit text concepts in the two hemispheres. We used an item-priming-in-recognition paradigm in combination with a lateralized visual-field manipulation. We found evidence for a propositionally structured representation in the left hemisphere, that is, priming effects that reflected the linear distance between primes and targets in the propositional structure of passages. We also found that the right hemisphere represented explicit text concepts, but we found no evidence that these concepts were organized structurally. In a second experiment, we found our item priming effects reflected the representation of text information in memory and did not reflect lexical-semantic priming at test.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16298668     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  9 in total

1.  The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  Chantel S Prat; Debra L Long; Kathleen Baynes
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Finding the right word: hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Building coherence: A framework for exploring the breakdown of links across clause boundaries in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tali Ditman; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality.

Authors:  Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Discourse Impairments Following Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2008-11

6.  A rubric for extracting idea density from oral language samples.

Authors:  Vineeta Chand; Kathleen Baynes; Lisa M Bonnici; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias
Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci       Date:  2012-01

7.  ERP evidence for memory and predictive mechanisms in word-to-text integration.

Authors:  Joseph Z Stafura; Benjamin Rickles; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Hemispheric differences in the organization of memory for text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Two sides of meaning: the scalp-recorded n400 reflects distinct contributions from the cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.