Literature DB >> 16298662

Obesity predicts increased overall complications following pancreas transplantation.

S I Hanish1, R P Petersen, B H Collins, J Tuttle-Newhall, C E Marroquin, P C Kuo, D W Butterly, S R Smith, D M Desai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the role of recipient body mass index (BMI) on postoperative complications in patients receiving pancreas transplants.
METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of 145 consecutive patients undergoing either simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) or pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation from January 1997 through December 2003. Variables analyzed included: age, sex, BMI, number of prior transplants, cytomegalovirus status of donor and recipient, postoperative insulin resistance, complications, and overall patient and graft survival. Differences in continuous variables and dichotomous variables were evaluated using two-tailed t test and Fisher exact test, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify predictors of overall complications following surgery.
RESULTS: Obesity was defined by a BMI > or = 30. Of the 145 patients, 33 (23%) had a BMI > or = 30 and 112 (77%) had a BMI < 30. There was no significant difference in age or sex between obese and nonobese patients (P = .98 and P = .56, respectively). The type of transplantation, SPK or PAK, did not affect the complication rate (P = .36). Overall complications (infection, dehiscence, evisceration, ventral hernia, allograft failure, gangrene, necrotizing fasciitis, postoperative bleeding, or death) were significantly higher in the obese group (81% vs 40%, P < .001). Obesity was specifically associated with increased frequency of dehiscence, ventral hernia, intra-abdominal infection, gangrene, necrotizing fasciitis, and repeat laparotomy. Obese patients also had a threefold higher rate of graft pancreatitis/enteric leak. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age > or = 50 and BMI > or = 30 as independent predictors of overall complications following surgery (odds ratio 4.0, P = .014 and OR 6.8, P < .001, respectively). There was no difference identified between groups with regards to allograft failure, posttransplant insulin resistance, and death.
CONCLUSION: Obese patients are at increased risk of overall complications following pancreas transplantation. Specifically, obese patients experience higher frequency of dehiscence, ventral hernia, intra-abdominal infection, gangrene, and necrotizing fasciitis. This study demonstrates the need for careful postoperative monitoring in the obese patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16298662     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  9 in total

1.  The effect of tobacco consumption and body mass index on complications and hospital stay after inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  D Lindström; O Sadr Azodi; R Bellocco; A Wladis; S Linder; J Adami
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Biliopancreatic diversion in a renal transplant patient.

Authors:  Maite López Deogracias; Agustin Domínguez-Diez; Rosa Palomar-Fontanet; Monica González-Noriega; E Rodrigo; G Fernández-Fresnedo; J A Zubimendi; Francisco Olmedo; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas; M Arias; Carlos Fernández-Escalante
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Medical Weight Loss Prior to Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Is it Feasible?

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Kasim Aydogdu; Kevin Grafmiller; Clayton C Petro; Gregg H Faiman; Ajita Prabhu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  The clinical significance of pancreatic steatosis.

Authors:  Mark M Smits; Erwin J M van Geenen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Incidence and risk factors of incisional hernia formation following abdominal organ transplantation.

Authors:  Carter T Smith; Micah G Katz; David Foley; Bridget Welch; Glen E Leverson; Luke M Funk; Jacob A Greenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Pancreas transplantation: review.

Authors:  Roberto Ferreira Meirelles Júnior; Paolo Salvalaggio; Alvaro Pacheco-Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Exploring the metabolic syndrome: Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease.

Authors:  Roberto Catanzaro; Biagio Cuffari; Angelo Italia; Francesco Marotta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Effectiveness and versatility of biological prosthesis in transplanted patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Vennarecci; Gianluca Mascianà; Edoardo De Werra; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Daniele Ferraro; Mirco Burocchi; Giovanni Tortorelli; Nicola Guglielmo; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-24

9.  Robotic pancreas transplantation in a type 1 diabetic patient with morbid obesity: A case report.

Authors:  Chun Chieh Yeh; Mario Spaggiari; Ivo Tzvetanov; José Oberholzer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.