Literature DB >> 16297085

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk in California.

Nathan J Coombs1, Richard Taylor, Nicholas Wilcken, James Fiorica, John Boyages.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have documented increased breast cancer risks with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), but these do not give a woman her specific absolute risk for the remainder of her life. This article estimates the magnitude of the effect of HRT on breast cancer incidence in California and calculates a woman's cumulative risk of breast cancer with different formulations and durations of HRT use. The effects of HRT on the underlying breast cancer incidence were estimated using the attributable fraction method, applying HRT prevalence data from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey and published rates of higher relative risk (RR) from HRT use from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study and Million Women's Survey (MWS). The annual number of breast cancers potentially attributable to HRT in California was estimated, along with individual cumulative risk of breast cancer for various ages to 79 years according to HRT use, duration, and formulation. Using the WHI data, 829 of 19,000 breast cancers (4.3%) in California may be attributable to HRT. This figure increases to 3401 (17.4%) when the MWS RRs are applied. Use of estrogen-only HRT or short-term (approximately 5 years) use of combined HRT has a minimal effect on the cumulative risk calculated to the age of 79 years; application of the MWS data to a Californian woman commencing HRT at the age of 50 years (no HRT, 8.5%; estrogen only, 8.6%; combined, 9.1%). Prolonged (approximately 10 years) use of combined HRT increases the cumulative risk to 10.3%. This article demonstrates that HRT will generate a small additional risk of breast cancer in an individual. The reduction in perimenopausal symptoms may be considered sufficient to warrant this extra risk. However, this view needs to be balanced because the small increases in individual risk will be magnified, producing a noticeable change in population cancer caseload where HRT use is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16297085     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00132.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

1.  Association between lifestyle, menstrual/reproductive history, and histological factors and risk of breast cancer in women biopsied for benign breast disease.

Authors:  Rhonda Arthur; Yihong Wang; Kenny Ye; Andrew G Glass; Mindy Ginsberg; Olivier Loudig; Thomas Rohan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Hormone use and lung cancer incidence: the Rancho Bernardo cohort study.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Deborah L Wingard; Wael K Al-Delaimy
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Proportion of invasive breast cancer attributable to risk factors modifiable after menopause.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kathleen M Egan; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Population attributable risk of breast cancer in white women associated with immediately modifiable risk factors.

Authors:  Christina A Clarke; David M Purdie; Sally L Glaser
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.