Literature DB >> 16296904

Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?

Michael Frass1, E Schuster, Ilse Muchitsch, Jeff Duncan, Walter Gei, Gloria Kozel, Christa Kastinger-Mayr, Anton E Felleitner, Christian Reiter, Christian Endler, Menachem Oberbaum.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16296904     DOI： 10.1089/acm.2005.11.780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Altern Complement Med        ISSN： 1075-5535            Impact factor:   2.579


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Is using Nazi research to condemn homeopathy ethical or scientific?

Authors:  Lionel R Milgrom; Suse Moebius
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Immunology and homeopathy. 4. Clinical studies-part 1.

Authors:  Paolo Bellavite; Riccardo Ortolani; Francesco Pontarollo; Valeria Piasere; Giovanni Benato; Anita Conforti
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Journeys in the country of the blind: entanglement theory and the effects of blinding on trials of homeopathy and homeopathic provings.

Authors:  Lionel R Milgrom
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Evaluating the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's position on the implausible effectiveness of homeopathic treatments.

Authors:  Andrew Turner
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2017-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.