Literature DB >> 16295703

A controlled trial of a Quit and Win contest.

Ellen J Hahn1, Mary Kay Rayens, Todd A Warnick, Costel Chirila, Robert T Rasnake, Todd P Paul, Dawn Christie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a state-of-the-art Quit and Win contest on tobacco quit rates at 3, 6, and 12 months after the 30-day quit period.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental with a volunteer sample of 494 Quit and Win contest registrants (treatment group) and 512 randomly selected tobacco users not exposed to the promotional media campaign (control group). Intervention included a 30-day quit period to be eligible for large cash prizes; provider advice via weekly mailings; online and telephone quit assistance; media campaign; and community support.
SETTING: Community-based intervention in Kentucky.
SUBJECTS: A total of 1006 adult tobacco users. MEASURES: Quit rates were measured using 7-day point prevalence for tobacco use. Urine cotinine measurements confirmed self-reported quitting.
RESULTS: Treatment group participants were significantly more likely than controls to experience quitting during the 1-year follow-up, as determined by both self-report and urine confirmation. After adjusting for baseline differences in demographics, tobacco use, and stage of change, those in the treatment group had 2.6 times the odds of reporting quitting in the postintervention period and 5.3 times the odds of experiencing quitting confirmed by urine cotinine, relative to controls. Women, minorities, and low-income tobacco users had equal odds of quitting as men, whites, and those with higher incomes.
CONCLUSIONS: That the contest was minimally intensive and yielded a relatively high, quit rate demonstrates the potential effectiveness of the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16295703     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  6 in total

1.  Interventions to increase smoking cessation at the population level: how much progress has been made in the last two decades?

Authors:  Shu-Hong Zhu; Madeleine Lee; Yue-Lin Zhuang; Anthony Gamst; Tanya Wolfson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy.

Authors:  Judith Lumley; Catherine Chamberlain; Therese Dowswell; Sandy Oliver; Laura Oakley; Lyndsey Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

3.  Competitions for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Rafael Perera; Nicola Lindson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 4.  Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.

Authors:  Catherine Chamberlain; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Sandy Oliver; Jenny R Caird; Susan M Perlen; Sandra J Eades; James Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-23

5.  A pilot study assessing the addition of a Quit and Win program to pharmacist-led intensive smoking cessation therapy in a predominantly underserved, minority population.

Authors:  Kirk E Evoy; Kentya H Ford; Sabina Nduaguba; Amber Taylor; Lindsay Thomas
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 6.  Which eHealth interventions are most effective for smoking cessation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Huyen Phuc Do; Bach Xuan Tran; Quyen Le Pham; Long Hoang Nguyen; Tung Thanh Tran; Carl A Latkin; Michael P Dunne; Philip Ra Baker
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.