Literature DB >> 16295247

A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit.

Jill E Preminger1, Ryan Carpenter, Craig H Ziegler.   

Abstract

Using the threshold equalizing noise (TEN) test, 49 subjects with at least two pure-tone thresholds per ear greater than 50 dB HL and none greater than 80 dB HL were evaluated for the presence or absence of dead regions. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the prevalence of cochlear dead regions in this clinical population, (2) measure whether listeners with dead regions performed differently than listeners without dead regions on a speech intelligibility in noise test, and (3) determine whether cochlear dead regions are associated with reduced subjective hearing aid performance. The results showed that (1) twenty-nine percent of the subjects tested positive for dead regions, (2) listeners with dead regions had poorer sentence understanding in noise than listeners without dead regions and (3) listeners with dead regions perceived poorer subjective hearing aid performance in listening environments with reverberation or background noise as compared to those without dead regions.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16295247     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.8.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  13 in total

1.  Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.

Authors:  Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The EarLens system: new sound transduction methods.

Authors:  Rodney Perkins; Jonathan P Fay; Paul Rucker; Micha Rosen; Lisa Olson; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Jani A Johnson; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Jani Johnson; Izel Rivera
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; J Andrew Dundas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Dawna Lewis; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Michael Blackburn; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Rene Gifford; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.