Literature DB >> 16294989

Risk determination for patients with direct access to physical therapy in military health care facilities.

Josef H Moore1, Danny J McMillian, Michael D Rosenthal, Marc D Weishaar.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Nonexperimental, retrospective, descriptive design.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to ascertain whether direct access to physical therapy placed military health care beneficiaries at risk for adverse events related to their management.
BACKGROUND: Military health care beneficiaries have the option at most US military hospitals and clinics to first enter the health care system through physical therapy by direct access, without referral from another privileged health care provider. This level of autonomous practice incurs broad responsibilities and raises concern regarding the delivery of safe, competent, and appropriate patient care administered by physical therapists (PTs) when patients are not first examined and then referred by a physician or other privileged health care provider. While military PTs practice autonomously in a variety of health care settings, they do not work independently within any facility. Military PTs and physicians rely on one another for sharing and collaboration of information regarding patient care and clinical research as warranted. Additionally, military PTs are indirectly supervised by physicians. METHODS AND MEASURES: To reduce provider bias, a retrospective analysis was performed at 25 military health care sites (6 Army, 11 Navy, and 8 Air Force) on patients seen in physical therapy from October 1999 through January 2003. During this 40-month period, 95 PTs (88 military and 7 civilian) were credentialed to provide care throughout the various medical sites. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for total workload, number of new patients seen with and without referral, documented patient adverse events reported to each facility's Risk Management Office, and any disciplinary or legal action against a physical therapist.
RESULTS: During the 40-month observation period, 472 013 patient visits were recorded. Of these, 112 653 (23.9%) were new patients, with 50 799 (45.1%) of the new patients seen through direct access without physician referral. Throughout the 40-month data collection period, there were no reported adverse events resulting from the PTs' diagnoses or management, regardless of how patients accessed physical therapy services. Additionally, none of the PTs had their credentials or state licenses modified or revoked for disciplinary action. There also had been no litigation cases filed against the US Government involving PTs during the same period.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this preliminary study clearly demonstrate that patients seen in military health care facilities are at minimal risk for gross negligent care when evaluated and managed by PTs, with or without physician referral. The significance of these findings with respect to direct access is important for not only our beneficiaries but also our profession and the facilities in which we practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16294989     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.10.674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  16 in total

1.  Imaging in conjunction with physical therapy in management of a patient with history of thoracic tumour.

Authors:  Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; William G Boissonnault
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

2.  Value-Based Care for Musculoskeletal Pain: Are Physical Therapists Ready to Deliver?

Authors:  Trevor A Lentz; Adam P Goode; Charles A Thigpen; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04-17

3.  Physical Therapy as the First Point of Care to Treat Low Back Pain: An Instrumental Variables Approach to Estimate Impact on Opioid Prescription, Health Care Utilization, and Costs.

Authors:  Bianca K Frogner; Kenneth Harwood; C Holly A Andrilla; Malaika Schwartz; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN A DIRECT-ACCESS SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY CLINIC: A 2-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE PRACTICE ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Michael S Crowell; Erik A Dedekam; Michael R Johnson; Scott C Dembowski; Richard B Westrick; Donald L Goss
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

5.  A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY.

Authors:  Ryan Rundle; Jared Roberts; Gabe Whitney; Steve Mankins; Caleb Dille; Megan Donaldson; Amy Hassen
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02

6.  Evaluation of an advanced-practice physical therapist in a specialty shoulder clinic: diagnostic agreement and effect on wait times.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Susan Robarts; Deborah Kennedy; Cheryl McKnight; Anne Marie Macleod; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  Acetabular labral tears: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination by a physical therapist, orthopaedic surgeon, and orthopaedic residents.

Authors:  Barbara A Springer; Norman W Gill; Brett A Freedman; Amy E Ross; Matthew A Javernick; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-02

8.  A comparison of health care use for physician-referred and self-referred episodes of outpatient physical therapy.

Authors:  Jane Pendergast; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Janet K Freburger; Pamela A Duffy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity and specificity of the ScreenAssist Lumbar Questionnaire in comparison with primary care provider tests and measures of low back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shala Cunningham
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-02

Review 10.  Taking responsibility for the early assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain: a review and critical analysis.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Jan Hartvigsen; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.