Literature DB >> 1629484

Temporal measures of anticipatory labial coarticulation for the vowel/u/: within- and cross-subject variability.

J S Perkell1, M L Matthies.   

Abstract

The timing of upper lip protrusion movements and accompanying acoustic events was examined for multiple repetitions of word pairs such as "lee coot" and "leaked coot" by four speakers of American English. The duration of the intervocalic consonant string was manipulated by using various combinations of /s/, /t/, /k/, /h/, and /#/. Pairwise comparisons were made of consonant string duration (acoustic /i/ offset to acoustic /u/ onset) with durations of: protrusion movement beginning to acoustic /u/ onset, maximum acceleration of the movement to acoustic /u/ onset, and acoustic /u/ onset to movement end. There were some consonant-specific protrusion effects, primarily on the movement beginning event for /s/. Inferences from measures of the maximum acceleration and movement end events for the non-/s/ subset suggested the simultaneous and variable expression of three competing constraints: (1) end the protrusion movement during the voiced part of the /u/; (2) use a preferred movement duration; and (3) begin the /u/-related protrusion movement when permitted by relaxation of the perceptually motivated constraint that the preceding /i/ be unrounded. The subjects differed in the degree of expression of each constraint, but the results generally indicate that anticipatory coarticulation of lip protrusion is influenced both by acoustic-phonetic context dependencies and dynamical properties of movements. Because of the extensive variation in the data and the small number of subjects, these ideas are tentative; additional work is needed to explore them further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629484     DOI: 10.1121/1.403778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Interarticulator phasing, locus equations, and degree of coarticulation.

Authors:  A Löfqvist
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interarticulator programming in VCV sequences: lip and tongue movements.

Authors:  A Löfqvist; V L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Test of the movement expansion model: anticipatory vowel lip protrusion and constriction in French and English speakers.

Authors:  Aude Noiray; Marie-Agnès Cathiard; Lucie Ménard; Christian Abry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Timing in talking: what is it used for, and how is it controlled?

Authors:  Alice Turk; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The breadth of coarticulatory units in children and adults.

Authors:  Lisa Goffman; Anne Smith; Lori Heisler; Michael Ho
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Routes to lenition: an acoustic study.

Authors:  Eftychia Eftychiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Timing Evidence for Symbolic Phonological Representations and Phonology-Extrinsic Timing in Speech Production.

Authors:  Alice Turk; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-24

8.  An informal logic of feedback-based temporal control.

Authors:  Sam Tilsen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  No, there is no 150 ms lead of visual speech on auditory speech, but a range of audiovisual asynchronies varying from small audio lead to large audio lag.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Schwartz; Christophe Savariaux
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Spatially Conditioned Speech Timing: Evidence and Implications.

Authors:  Jason A Shaw; Wei-Rong Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.