Literature DB >> 16294365

Using a pharmaco-epidemiological approach to estimate diabetes type 2 prevalence in Portugal.

Filipa Duarte-Ramos1, José Cabrita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of drug-treated diabetes type 2 in Portugal using drug consumption data and accounting for the proportion of patients treated with combinations of oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs).
METHODS: The prevalence of diabetes treated by OHAs was calculated on the basis of: IMS-Health data for Portugal (2003) and two measures of daily drug intake-defined daily dose (DDD) and prescribed daily dose (PDD), after correcting for the proportion of patients treated with two or more OHAs. The PDD and proportion of patients in combination therapies have been obtained in a descriptive, cross-sectional national survey, conducted in 2003, by inquiry of 1,046 type 2 diabetics country wide distributed.
RESULTS: Drug use study: We have studied 1046 type 2 diabetics (539 women, 501 men, 6 sex unknown), with a mean age of 64.5 (SD=11) years. OHAs were prescribed as monotherapy in 46.8% (489/1,046) of the patients and the remaining 557 (53.2%) received from 2 to 4 OHAs concomitantly.Diabetes prevalence: Using DDD as the mean daily intake consumption unit, the prevalence of drug-treated type 2 diabetes was 4.15%, which dropped to 2.52% when the proportion of OHAs associations was taken into account. Using PDD these values were 4.48% and 2.72%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Since a high proportion of patients are treated with combination of OHAs in clinical practice, it is imperative to account for that confounder in order to improve the accuracy of estimate from drug consumption data. The use of this methodology provided a slight under-estimation of diabetes prevalence, compared with the National Health Authorities values (3%-5%). Nevertheless we consider this as an efficient tool to estimate drug-treated diabetes prevalence that should be implemented in a regular way for longitudinal observations, in order to generate signals. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16294365     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  5 in total

1.  Correlating pharmaceutical data with a national health survey as a proxy for estimating rural population health.

Authors:  Ronald E Cossman; Jeralynn S Cossman; Wesley L James; Troy Blanchard; Richard Thomas; Louis G Pol; Arthur G Cosby
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-09-14

2.  Pitfalls associated with the therapeutic reference pricing practice of asthma medication.

Authors:  Zoltan Kalo; Zsolt Abonyi-Toth; Zoltan Bartfai; Zoltan Voko
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  Discrepancies between prescribed and defined daily doses: a matter of patients or drug classes?

Authors:  Thomas Grimmsmann; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Counting drugs to understand the disease: the case of measuring the diabetes epidemic.

Authors:  Henrik Støvring; Morten Andersen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Anders Green; Werner Vach
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2007-02-21

5.  Drug utilisation study in a tertiary care center: recommendations for improving hospital drug dispensing policies.

Authors:  Niti Mittal; R Mittal; I Singh; Nusrat Shafiq; S Malhotra
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.975

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.