Literature DB >> 16294077

Effects of escharotomy as abdominal decompression on cardiopulmonary function and visceral perfusion in abdominal compartment syndrome with burn patients.

Jun Oda1, Masashi Ueyama, Katsuyuki Yamashita, Takuya Inoue, Nobuyuki Harunari, Yasumasa Ode, Kazuharu Mega, Yoshiki Aoki, Mitsuhiro Noborio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) can become fatal; however, it has rarely been described as a complication of burn injury. This study clarified the physiologic results of abdominal decompression (AD) for ACS in patients with burn injury in detail.
METHODS: Extensively burned patients admitted to our burn unit between January 2003 and February 2004 were prospectively monitored by pulmonary artery catheter. Physiologic parameters from the catheter, blood gas analysis, intrabladder pressure as a parameter of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), peak inspiratory pressure, and urine output (UO) were compared before and after escharotomy as AD in patients with ACS.
RESULTS: Eight of 36 patients who had sustained more than 30% total body surface area burn developed ACS requiring AD in 18.3 +/- 4.9 hours. AD significantly decreased IAP (52 +/- 9 cm H2O vs. 26 +/- 7 cm H2O), peak inspiratory pressure (53 +/- 13 cm H2O vs. 35 +/- 6 cm H2O), heart rate, and Paco2, and increased cardiac index (1.6 +/- 0.7 L/min/m2 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.9 L/min/m2), abdominal perfusion pressure (50 +/- 11 mm Hg vs. 72 +/- 17 mm Hg), UO (0.45 +/- 0.46 mL/h/kg vs. 2.0 +/- 2.1 mL/h/kg), and oxygen delivery index (290 +/- 195 mL/m2/min vs. 455 +/- 218 mL/m2/min). Impaired oxygen consumption index increased (86 +/- 43 mL/m2/min vs. 153 +/- 58 mL/m2/min) after AD.
CONCLUSION: In patients with severe burn injury, elevated IAP makes pulmonary artery wedge pressure and UO unreliable indices of preload or intravascular volume, and decreases abdominal perfusion in the resuscitation period. AD in these patients significantly improves the ventilation, hemodynamic parameters, and oxygen metabolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16294077     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174917.90514.4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  Intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome in burn patients.

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Chad G Ball; Duncan Nickerson; Scott K D'Amours
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in a severely burned patient.

Authors:  S Kollias; N Stampolidis; P Kourakos; E Mantzari; S Koupidis; S Tsaousi; A Dimitrouli; B Atiyeh; O Castana
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Early fluid resuscitation with hyperoncotic hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 (10%) in severe burn injury.

Authors:  Markus Béchir; Milo A Puhan; Simona B Neff; Merlin Guggenheim; Volker Wedler; John F Stover; Reto Stocker; Thomas A Neff
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  The neglected role of abdominal compliance in organ-organ interactions.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Yannick Peeters; Robert Wise
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Improving Outcomes With A Multidisciplinary Approach - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Martin Padar; Annika Reintam Blaser; Peep Talving; Edgar Lipping; Joel Starkopf
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  Recommendations for burns care in mass casualty incidents: WHO Emergency Medical Teams Technical Working Group on Burns (WHO TWGB) 2017-2020.

Authors:  Amy Hughes; Stian Kreken Almeland; Thomas Leclerc; Takayuki Ogura; Minoru Hayashi; Jody-Ann Mills; Ian Norton; Tom Potokar
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.744

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.