Literature DB >> 16293899

Identification of depression in an inner-city population using a simple screen.

Marianne T Haughey1, Yvette Calderon, Sandra Torres, Steven Nazario, Polly Bijur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare a brief screening tool with physicians' usual practice in detecting depressive symptoms in patients presenting with somatic complaints to an inner-city emergency department. Depression is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Underprivileged patients who rely on emergency departments for primary care remain at risk for undetected depression.
METHODS: This prospective observational study included all patients older than 18 years presenting to an urgent care clinic staffed by emergency physicians in an urban public hospital during an eight-week period. Clinically unstable patients and those with a chief complaint of depression were excluded. After consenting, patients completed a previously validated two-question screening tool for depression. Patients identified as having depressive symptoms were referred to social workers for evaluation for possible psychiatric intervention.
RESULTS: Of the 226 patients enrolled, 55% (124/226; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 48% to 61%) screened positive for depressive symptoms. Physicians identified 14% (31/226; 95% CI = 10% to 19%) as having depressive symptoms. The kappa value was 0.22 (95% CI = 0.14 to 0.29). All patients but one identified as positive by the physicians screened positive on the screening tool. Patients who screened positive were referred to social workers. The physicians failed to identify 19 of the patients who needed further psychiatric care.
CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are common among patients in urgent care settings with somatic complaints. A simple screening tool identified more patients for further evaluation than does physicians' usual practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16293899     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  Intendedness of pregnancy and other predictive factors for symptoms of prenatal depression in a population-based study.

Authors:  Jena L Fellenzer; Donald A Cibula
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

2.  Barriers to depression treatment among low-income, Latino emergency department patients.

Authors:  Anjanette Wells; Isabel T Lagomasino; Lawrence A Palinkas; Jennifer M Green; Diana Gonzalez
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-09-30

Review 3.  Case identification of depression in patients with chronic physical health problems: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of 113 studies.

Authors:  Nicholas Meader; Alex J Mitchell; Carolyn Chew-Graham; David Goldberg; Maria Rizzo; Victoria Bird; David Kessler; Jon Packham; Mark Haddad; Stephen Pilling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Predicting 7-day and 3-month functional outcomes after an ED visit for acute nontraumatic low back pain.

Authors:  Benjamin W Friedman; Laura Mulvey; Michelle Davitt; Hong Choi; David Esses; Polly E Bijur; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Emergency Department Screening for Adolescent Mental Health Disorders: The Who, What, When, Where, Why and How It Could and Should Be Done.

Authors:  Thomas H Chun; Susan J Duffy; James G Linakis
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  Development of a fatigue and functional impact scale in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  David Cella; Hema N Viswanathan; Ron D Hays; Tito R Mendoza; Kevin D Stein; David J Pasta; Aimee J Foreman; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Joel D Kallich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.