Literature DB >> 1629387

Predictive value of symptoms of atypical depression for differential drug treatment outcome.

P J McGrath1, J W Stewart, W M Harrison, K Ocepek-Welikson, J G Rabkin, E N Nunes, S G Wager, E Tricamo, F M Quitkin, D F Klein.   

Abstract

Data for 401 depressed outpatients with mood reactivity who participated in a randomized trial comparing placebo, imipramine, and phenelzine were analyzed for predictors of differential response by stepwise multiple regression techniques. Features of the Columbia criteria for atypical depression including oversleeping, overeating, severe anergy, and pathologic rejection sensitivity were each predictive of a poorer response to imipramine than to phenelzine only when compared to those patients with none of the features. These features were not additive in their contribution to differential outcome. Lack of endogenous features was not predictive of a differential drug treatment response. Compared with patients who have no symptoms of atypical depression, patients with any of the four features had an inferior imipramine response rather than a superior phenelzine response. These analyses indicate that the clear differential responsivity to medication treatment in atypical depression is not simply related to any one defining symptom and that further correlates of this apparent biological heterogeneity need to be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  9 in total

1.  Epidemiology of major depression with atypical features: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

Authors:  Carlos Blanco; Oriana Vesga-López; Jonathan W Stewart; Shang-Min Liu; Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Testing atypical depression definitions.

Authors:  Franco Benazzi
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 3.  Personalized medicine for depression: can we match patients with treatments?

Authors:  Gregory E Simon; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Atypical depression.

Authors:  Tanvir Singh; Kristi Williams
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-04

5.  Behavioral activation for the treatment of atypical depression: a pilot open trial.

Authors:  Lauren M Weinstock; Mary K Munroe; Ivan W Miller
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2011-04-19

6.  Depressed older patients with the atypical features of interpersonal rejection sensitivity and reversed-vegetative symptoms are similar to younger atypical patients.

Authors:  Natalie Sachs-Ericsson; Edward Selby; Elizabeth Corsentino; Nicole Collins; Kathryn Sawyer; Jennifer Hames; Darleine Arce; Thomas Joiner; David C Steffens
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.105

7.  Depression With Atypical Features: Diagnostic Validity, Prevalence, and Treatment.

Authors:  Frederic M. Quitkin
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06

8.  Predictors of remission in depression to individual and combined treatments (PReDICT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Elisabeth B Binder; Joseph F Cubells; Mark M Goodman; Mary E Kelley; Becky Kinkead; Michael Kutner; Charles B Nemeroff; D Jeffrey Newport; Michael J Owens; Thaddeus W W Pace; James C Ritchie; Vivianne Aponte Rivera; Drew Westen; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Key considerations in the pharmacological management of treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Mani Yavi; Ioline D Henter; Lawrence T Park; Carlos Zarate
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.