Literature DB >> 16292642

Gravitational influences on reference frames for mapping somatic stimuli in brain-damaged patients.

Andrea Peru1, Valentina Moro, Lorenzo Sattibaldi, Jean Sebastien Morgant, Salvatore M Aglioti.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the manipulation of body position in space can modulate the manifestations of visual neglect. Here, we investigated in right brain-damaged patients (RBD) the possible influence of gravitational inputs on the capability to detect tactile stimuli delivered to hands positioned in ipsilesional or contralesional space. RBD patients (with or without impairments in detecting contralesional stimuli under single and double stimulation conditions) and healthy control subjects were tested in a tactile detection task in which gravitational (upright vs. supine) and hand position (anatomical vs. crossed) variables were orthogonally varied. The postural manipulation of the entire body turned out to influence the degree of tactile detection. In particular, RBD patients with tactile deficits detected a significantly higher number of left-sided stimuli in the supine posture than in the upright posture. Moreover, crossing of hands improved the ability of RBD patients with tactile deficits in detecting stimuli delivered to their left contralesional hand. The beneficial effect of lying supine was independent of the spatial position of the hands, thus suggesting that the improvement of performance dependent upon entire-body posture and that dependent upon crossing hands may rely upon separate mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16292642     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0132-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Evidence for a unimodal somatosensory attention system.

Authors:  Elizabeth Olson; Marianna Stark; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Changes in spatial position of hands modify tactile extinction but not disownership of contralesional hand in two right brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  Valentina Moro; Massimiliano Zampini; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.881

3.  Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  S Aglioti; N Smania; A Peru
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Gravity and hemineglect.

Authors:  L Pizzamiglio; G Vallar; F Doricchi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Contralateral and ipsilateral tactile extinction in patients with right and left focal brain damage.

Authors:  G Gainotti; C De Bonis; A Daniele; C Caltagirone
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.292

6.  Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline.

Authors:  H O Karnath; K Christ; W Hartje
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 7.  Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: a neuropsychological perspective.

Authors:  G Vallar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Coding of Spatial Information in the Somatosensory System: Evidence from Patients with Neglect following Parietal Lobe Damage.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  G Vallar; G Bottini; M L Rusconi; R Sterzi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The asymmetric lateralization of tactile extinction in patients with unilateral cerebral dysfunction.

Authors:  A S Schwartz; P L Marchok; C J Kreinick; R E Flynn
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  7 in total

1.  Do supine position and deprivation of visual environment influence spatial neglect?

Authors:  Sahawanatou Gassama; Antoine Deplancke; Arnaud Saj; Jacques Honoré; Marc Rousseaux
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  From maps to form to space: touch and the body schema.

Authors:  Jared Medina; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Michael McCloskey; H Branch Coslett; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  What can errors tell us about body representations?

Authors:  Jared Medina; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Peripersonal Space from a multisensory perspective: the distinct effect of the visual and tactile components of Visuo-Tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Maddalena Beccherle; Stefania Facchetti; Francesca Villani; Marzia Zanini; Michele Scandola
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Crossing the hands increases illusory self-touch.

Authors:  Polona Pozeg; Giulio Rognini; Roy Salomon; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hand Posture Modulates Perceived Tactile Distance.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.