T Pincus1, O G Segurado. 1. Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Box 5, Nashville, TN 37232-4500, USA. t.pincus@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To ask rheumatologists about the likelihood of performing a formal joint count at each visit of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in standard clinical care. METHOD: Direct query of rheumatologists at an international meeting of about 600 rheumatologists from 17 European countries. RESULTS: Overall, 14% of rheumatologists reported performing a formal joint count at each visit of each patient, and 44% of rheumatologists reported performing a formal joint count at more than 50% of visits of patients with RA. Therefore, 56% of rheumatologists reported performing a joint count at fewer than 50% of visits, including 45% at fewer than 25% of visits. One in eight rheumatologists (13%) reported never performing a formal joint count. CONCLUSION: Although the joint count remains the most specific measure for RA, most visits of most patients with RA to most rheumatologists do not include a formal quantitative joint count.
OBJECTIVE: To ask rheumatologists about the likelihood of performing a formal joint count at each visit of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in standard clinical care. METHOD: Direct query of rheumatologists at an international meeting of about 600 rheumatologists from 17 European countries. RESULTS: Overall, 14% of rheumatologists reported performing a formal joint count at each visit of each patient, and 44% of rheumatologists reported performing a formal joint count at more than 50% of visits of patients with RA. Therefore, 56% of rheumatologists reported performing a joint count at fewer than 50% of visits, including 45% at fewer than 25% of visits. One in eight rheumatologists (13%) reported never performing a formal joint count. CONCLUSION: Although the joint count remains the most specific measure for RA, most visits of most patients with RA to most rheumatologists do not include a formal quantitative joint count.
Authors: A V Klinkhoff; N Bellamy; C Bombardier; S Carette; A Chalmers; J M Esdaile; C Goldsmith; P Tugwell; H A Smythe; W W Buchanan Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1988-03 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: D T Felson; J J Anderson; M Boers; C Bombardier; M Chernoff; B Fried; D Furst; C Goldsmith; S Kieszak; R Lightfoot Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1993-06
Authors: H Singh; V Gupta; S Ray; H Kumar; P Talapatra; M Kaur; S Kumar; S Arya; R Mathur; N Ghangas Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2012-09-15 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Fenglong Xie; Lang Chen; Paul Muntner; Carlos G Grijalva; Claire Spettell; Joaquim Fernandes; Raechele M McMahan; John W Baddley; Kenneth G Saag; Timothy Beukelman; Elizabeth Delzell Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Burkhard F Leeb; Elke Böttcher; Hans-Peter Brezinschek; Christoph Czerwenka; Manfred Herold; Hans Hitzelhammer; Franz Mayrhofer; Rudolf Puchner; Franz Rainer; Bernhard Rintelen; Michael Schirmer; Ulrike Stuby; Hans Bröll Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 2.980