Literature DB >> 16291387

Superiority of postoperative epidural over intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in orthopedic oncologic patients.

Avi A Weinbroum1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery for bone malignancy is associated with intense postoperative pain. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) are used currently for postoperative pain control.
METHODS: The degree of pain control after resection of bone malignancy under combined general and epidural anesthesia followed postoperatively by prospectively randomized PCEA (ropivacaine 3.2 mg + fentanyl 8 microg/dose) or IV-PCA (morphine 2 mg/dose) (n = 35/group) was assessed. Postoperative analgesia delivery continued for up to 96 h; intramuscular rescue with diclofenac 75 mg was also available.
RESULTS: The mean hourly pain score among the PCEA patients was 3.0 +/- 0.9, compared with 4. 7 +/- 0.6 (P < .01) among the IV-PCA patients. All mean hourly pain scores in the PCEA patients, except for the first 2 hours of treatment, were less than 4/10, but they were higher in the IV-PCA patients. The demand for diclofenac was 2 times (n = 10) lower for the PCEA patients, compared with their IV counterparts (n = 20, P < .01); the same difference applied to the overall side effects (n = 15 vs n = 30, P < .01). Self-rated wakefulness and feelings of well-being were better in the PCEA patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ropivacaine + fentanyl via PCEA reduces pain better and affords better subjective feelings than IV morphine via PCA after resection of bone malignancy carried out under combined general and epidural anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16291387     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes for epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Andrew G Winer; John P Sfakianos; Vinay G Puttanniah; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Postoperative management using intensive patient-controlled epidural analgesia and early rehabilitation after an esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Saeki; Hiroshi Ishimura; Hidefumi Higashi; Dai Kitagawa; Junko Tanaka; Riichiroh Maruyama; Hidenori Katoh; Hirofumi Shimazoe; Kouta Yamauchi; Hitoshi Ayabe; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Development of a mobile ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block and catheter service.

Authors:  Christina L Jeng; Toni M Torrillo; Michael R Anderson; R Sean Morrison; Knox H Todd; Meg A Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Survival rate and perioperative data of patients who have undergone hemipelvectomy: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Alfredo Guilherme Haack Couto; Bruno Araújo; Roberto André Torres de Vasconcelos; Marcos José Renni; Clóvis Orlando Da Fonseca; Ismar Lima Cavalcanti
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Postoperative Regional Analgesia Is Effective in Preserving Perforin-Expressing Lymphocytes in Patients After Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Sandra Velcic Brumnjak; Ivan Rakovac; Dijana Papez Kinkela; Kresimir Bukal; Branko Sestan; Vera Tulic; Elisa Velcic Janjetic; Vlatka Sotosek Tokmadzic
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-31

6.  No evidence of real progress in treatment of acute pain, 1993-2012: scientometric analysis.

Authors:  Darin J Correll; Kamen V Vlassakov; Igor Kissin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.