Literature DB >> 16291105

Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence.

Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen1, Maarten Spruit, Patricia G Anderson, Paul W Pavlov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The use of stand-alone cervical interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) has become popular, but high subsidence rates have been reported in the literature.
PURPOSE: The authors present short-term radiological results of a titanium box cage with regard to fusion and subsidence. Reliable fusion and lack of subsidence may influence long-term clinical results. Early radiological data are necessary before implementation of this device on a larger scale can be accepted. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Retrospective radiological quality assessment study. PATIENT SAMPLE: ACDF using the titanium cage was performed in 71 consecutive patients at 106 levels. Diagnoses included cervical disc disease (57) and cervical spinal stenosis (14) after failed conservative treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subsidence and kyphosis were assessed on lateral cervical radiographs made directly postoperative and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, lateral flexion-extension radiographs were made to assess fusion.
METHODS: Subsidence of the cage was defined as a decrease in total vertical height of the two fused vertebral bodies as measured on the lateral cervical radiographs made 3 and 6 months postoperatively compared with the directly postoperative radiographs. Segmental kyphosis was measured as the angle between the posterior borders of the two vertebral bodies on the lateral radiograph.
RESULTS: No patients were lost to follow-up. Fusion was achieved after 6 months in all patients. At 3 and 6 months postoperative the same 10 cages (each in a different patient) had subsided. The C6-C7 level was significantly more frequently involved compared with all other levels. A segmental kyphotic alignment was observed in five patients at the C6-C7 level and in one patient at the C4-C5 level.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with cervical disc disease, the high subsidence tendency of the cage into the end plate of predominantly C7 is a disturbing phenomenon found in this study. A modified cage design that improves and extends contact with the inferior surface could be expected to reduce subsidence into C7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16291105     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  34 in total

1.  Analysis of clinically relevant mechanical and thermal characteristics of titanium foam spinal implants during drilling.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ito; Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi; Takahiro Murata; Kazuhiro Hongo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Jianxin Wu; Dan Luo; Xiaojian Ye; Xuyao Luo; Lisheng Yan; Haiping Qian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Subsidence after anterior cervical inter-body fusion. A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Erich Kast; Sharam Derakhshani; Matthias Bothmann; Joachim Oberle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Naresh Parvathreddy; Sujitha Sampath; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

5.  Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Jian Zhong; Jixiang Tan; Dandong Wu; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Cheng Xu; Bo Yin; Xin-Lei Xia; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Hong-Li Wang; Jun Yin; Ming-Hao Shao; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kwang-Bok Lee; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Ji-Hoon Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Efficacy of PEEK cages and plate augmentation in three-level anterior cervical fusion of elderly patients.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Song; Gyu Hyung Kim; Byeong Yeol Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

9.  Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Kwang Ho Roh; Ji Young Cho; Young Shin Ra; Seung Chul Rhim; Sung Woo Noh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-10-30

10.  Radiologic Assessment of Subsidence in Stand-Alone Cervical Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage.

Authors:  Sung-Kon Ha; Jung-Yul Park; Se-Hoon Kim; Dong-Jun Lim; Sang-Dae Kim; Sang-Kook Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.