Literature DB >> 16289567

Comparison of different methods for the solubilisation of Neospora caninum (Phylum Apicomplexa) antigen.

Annetta Zintl1, Stephen R Pennington, Grace Mulcahy.   

Abstract

Parasite antigens are of interest both for the development of better diagnostic tools and potential subunit vaccines. Particularly, relevant in this regard are membrane proteins as the first point of contact between host and parasite. Here, four different methods for the extraction and solubilisation of Neospora caninum proteins were evaluated by comparing protein yield, specific antigenicity and relative protein abundance in the electrophoresis profile. Extraction with SDS and sulphobetaines (SB) gave higher yields than those achieved using the standard sonication method. SDS and SB preparations also gave the best signal to noise ratio when used as capture antigens in an ELISA. Electrophoresis of the three preparations showed an even protein-banding pattern spread out over the 90-10 kDa size range. However, there were a greater proportion of lower molecular weight proteins when the sonication method was used suggesting that this method may have resulted in the degradation/proteolysis of some proteins. Extraction with Triton X-114 resulted in the concentration of three or four proteins but led to a considerable reduction in the overall protein yield. The ELISA indicated that not all of the Triton X-114 extracted proteins were involved in specific antibody binding. The optimal extraction method for parasite proteins depends on the intended application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16289567     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  1 in total

1.  Protective effect of intranasal immunization with Neospora caninum membrane antigens against murine neosporosis established through the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Pedro Ferreirinha; Joana Dias; Alexandra Correia; Begoña Pérez-Cabezas; Carlos Santos; Luzia Teixeira; Adília Ribeiro; António Rocha; Manuel Vilanova
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.397

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.