Literature DB >> 16289205

Effect of mechanical stress on biofilms challenged by different chemicals.

Manuel Simões1, Maria Olivia Pereira, Maria João Vieira.   

Abstract

In this study a methodology was applied in order to ascertain the mechanical stability of biofilms, by using a stainless-steel (SS) rotating device immersed in a biological reactor where biofilms formed by Pseudomonas fluorescens were allowed to grow for 7 days at a Reynolds number of agitation of 2400. The biofilms developed with this system were characterised in terms of amount of total, extracellular and intracellular proteins and polysaccharides, amount of mass, metabolic activity and mechanical stability, showing that the biofilms were active, had a high content of extracellular constituents and an inherent mechanical stability. In order to assess the role of chemical agents on the mechanical stability, the biofilms were exposed to chemical agents followed by mechanical treatments by submission to increase Reynolds number of agitation. Seven different chemical agents were tested (two non-oxidising biocides, three surfactants and two oxidising biocides) and their effects on the biofilm mechanical stability were evaluated. The increase in the Reynolds number increased the biofilm removal, but total biofilm removal was not found for all the conditions tested. For the experiment without chemical addition (only mechanical treatment), the biofilm remaining on the surface was about 76%. The chemical treatment followed by the subsequent mechanical treatment did not remove all the biofilms from the surface. The biofilm remaining on the SS cylinder ranged from 3% to 62%, depending on the chemical treatment, showing that the chemical treatment is far from being a cause that induces massive biofilm detachment and even the synergistic chemical and mechanical treatments did not promote biofilm removal. Some chemical agents promoted an increase in the biofilm mechanical stability such as glutaraldehyde (GTA), benzalkonium chloride (BC), except for the lower concentration tested, and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), except for the higher concentration tested. Treatments that promoted biofilm removal, to an extent similar to the control experiment (without chemical treatment), were BC, for the lower and the higher concentration of SDS. Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium hypochlorite (SHC) promoted the weakening of the biofilm mechanical stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16289205     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  27 in total

1.  Metal ions weaken the hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 biofilms.

Authors:  Carolina Falcón García; Martin Kretschmer; Carlos N Lozano-Andrade; Markus Schönleitner; Anna Dragoŝ; Ákos T Kovács; Oliver Lieleg
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 7.290

2.  The efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming and sonic-activated irrigation combined with QMiX solution or sodium hypochlorite against intracanal E. faecalis biofilm.

Authors:  M Balić; R Lucić; K Mehadžić; I Bago; I Anić; S Jakovljević; V Plečko
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effect of CaCO₃ particles and suspended bacteria on biofilm components and activity in the model recirculating cooling water system.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Wenwen Dong; Fei Yang; Lei Lu; Yongqiang Wang; Xiaochen Yin; Chaocheng Zhao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Cryptosporidium-Biofilm Interactions: a Review.

Authors:  M Lefebvre; R Razakandrainibe; I Villena; L Favennec; D Costa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Characterisation of the physical composition and microbial community structure of biofilms within a model full-scale drinking water distribution system.

Authors:  Katherine E Fish; Richard Collins; Nicola H Green; Rebecca L Sharpe; Isabel Douterelo; A Mark Osborn; Joby B Boxall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparative antibacterial potential of selected aldehyde-based biocides and surfactants against planktonic Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  M Simões; M O Pereira; I Machado; L C Simões; M J Vieira
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Epidemic of postsurgical infections caused by Mycobacterium massiliense.

Authors:  Rafael Silva Duarte; Maria Cristina Silva Lourenço; Leila de Souza Fonseca; Sylvia Cardoso Leão; Efigenia de Lourdes T Amorim; Ingrid L L Rocha; Fabrice Santana Coelho; Cristina Viana-Niero; Karen Machado Gomes; Marlei Gomes da Silva; Nádia Suely de Oliveira Lorena; Marcos Bettini Pitombo; Rosa M C Ferreira; Márcio Henrique de Oliveira Garcia; Gisele Pinto de Oliveira; Otilia Lupi; Bruno Rios Vilaça; Lúcia Rodrigues Serradas; Alberto Chebabo; Elizabeth Andrade Marques; Lúcia Martins Teixeira; Margareth Dalcolmo; Simone Gonçalves Senna; Jorge Luiz Mello Sampaio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Outbreaks due to Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii in southern Brazil: persistence of a single clone from 2007 to 2011.

Authors:  Luciana de S Nunes; Ludmila F Baethgen; Marta O Ribeiro; Cássia M Cardoso; Fernanda de Paris; Simone M M De David; Marlei G da Silva; Rafael S Duarte; Afonso L Barth
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Bacteria-surface interactions.

Authors:  Hannah H Tuson; Douglas B Weibel
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.679

Review 10.  Biophysics of biofilm infection.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.