Literature DB >> 16287893

Racial and age differences in colon examination surveillance following a diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Sharon Rolnick1, Sharon Hensley Alford, Gena P Kucera, Kristine Fortman, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Michelle Jankowski, Christine C Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis is to describe factors associated with colorectal surveillance following diagnosis and treatment of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Subjects were identified as part of the HMO Cancer Research Network's study of colorectal cancer survivors. To be eligible for the main study, patients had to be part of the staff model components of health maintenance organizations in southeastern Michigan and Minnesota. Using computerized databases, individuals were identified who were 40 years or older with incident nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2000. Using data current through 2002, we analyzed the cohort using chi-square test statistics, life tables, and Cox proportional hazards models to understand variations in posttreatment surveillance practices. Subjects were followed up from date of diagnosis to date of recurrence, death, disenrollment from the health plan, or loss to follow-up, which ever came first. We assessed factors associated with colorectal surveillance at 1, 3, and 5 years after treatment. We also included an analysis comparing those who received an exam and those who didn't regardless of exam timing.
RESULTS: A total of 908 patients were eligible for the main study. Of these, we excluded subjects who were not white or African American (n = 27), resulting in an analytic sample of 881 (97% of the eligible cohort). Twenty-five percent of subjects were African American, 43% were female, and 48% were aged 70 years or older. The proportion who received an exam at 1 year was 18%, at 3 years was 60%, and at 5 years was 67%. Chi-square tests showed that African Americans were statistically significantly less likely than whites to receive an exam at all three time points. The Cox proportional hazards model for examinations regardless of timing and adjusted for confounders showed that African Americans were still less likely than whites to receive an exam (hazard ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51 to 0.75). The same trend in undersurveillance was also observed for those 80 years of age or older at diagnosis, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.26 to 0.57).
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that colorectal cancer survivors who are African American or aged 80 years or more at diagnosis are less likely to receive posttreatment colorectal surveillance. Whether these differences are due to system or patient level barriers needs further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287893     DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  26 in total

1.  Examining Adherence With Recommendations for Follow-Up in the Prevention Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors Study.

Authors:  Nikki A Hawkins; Zahava Berkowitz; Juan Rodriguez; Jacqueline W Miller; Susan A Sabatino; Lori A Pollack
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival: to what extent are racial disparities explained by differences in treatment, tumor characteristics, or hospital characteristics?

Authors:  Arica White; Sally W Vernon; Luisa Franzini; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Heidi Woo; Tatiana D Starr; Lina H Jandorf; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Adherence to surveillance care guidelines after breast and colorectal cancer treatment with curative intent.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Mark C Hornbrook; Paul A Fishman; Debra P Ritzwoller; Maureen C O'Keeffe Rossetti; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The role of social support in posttreatment surveillance among African American survivors of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daisy Le; Cheryl L Holt; Maria Pisu; Aquila Brown-Galvan; Temeika L Fairley; Judith Lee Smith; Arica White; Ingrid J Hall; Robert A Oster; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2014

6.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Morris Weinberger; John Z Ayanian; Noel T Brewer; Craig C Earle; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Deborah A Fisher; Bryan J Weiner; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Sally W Vernon; L Kay Bartholomew; Caitlin C Murphy; Shirley M Bluethmann
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Association of health beliefs and colonoscopy use among survivors of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Noel T Brewer; Robert S Sandler; Bryan J Weiner; Christopher F Martin; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Advancing Health Equity in Cancer Survivorship: Opportunities for Public Health.

Authors:  Judith Lee Smith; Ingrid J Hall
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.