Literature DB >> 16287875

Inactivation of Ku-mediated end joining suppresses mec1Delta lethality by depleting the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 through a pathway controlled by Tel1 kinase and the Mre11 complex.

Yves Corda1, Sang Eun Lee, Sylvine Guillot, André Walther, Julie Sollier, Ayelet Arbel-Eden, James E Haber, Vincent Géli.   

Abstract

RAD53 and MEC1 are essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for the DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoint responses. Their lethality can be suppressed by increasing the intracellular pool of deoxynucleotide triphosphates. We report that deletion of YKU70 or YKU80 suppresses mec1Delta, but not rad53Delta, lethality. We show that suppression of mec1Delta lethality is not due to Ku--associated telomeric defects but rather results from the inability of Ku- cells to efficiently repair DNA double strand breaks by nonhomologous end joining. Consistent with these results, mec1Delta lethality is also suppressed by lif1Delta, which like yku70Delta and yku80Delta, prevents nonhomologous end joining. The viability of yku70Delta mec1Delta and yku80Delta mec1Delta cells depends on the ATM-related Tel1 kinase, the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex, and the DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad9. We further report that this Mec1-independent pathway converges with the Rad53/Dun1-regulated checkpoint kinase cascade and leads to the degradation of the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287875      PMCID: PMC1291227          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.23.10652-10664.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  60 in total

1.  Mitotic treasures in the nucleolus.

Authors:  J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective.

Authors:  B B Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Wakayama; T Kondo; S Ando; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Yeast Ku protein plays a direct role in telomeric silencing and counteracts inhibition by rif proteins.

Authors:  K Mishra; D Shore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Telomerase subunit overexpression suppresses telomere-specific checkpoint activation in the yeast yku80 mutant.

Authors:  S H Teo; S P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Involvement of the checkpoint protein Mec1p in silencing of gene expression at telomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R J Craven; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Pellicioli; C Lucca; G Liberi; F Marini; M Lopes; P Plevani; A Romano; P P Di Fiore; M Foiani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Down-regulation of Ku 70 and Ku 80 mRNA expression in transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder related to tumor progression.

Authors:  Monika Korabiowska; Thomas Quentin; Thilo Schlott; Hanne Bauer; Ekkehard Kunze
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A L Goldstein; J H McCusker
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.239

10.  Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks.

Authors:  C I Nugent; G Bosco; L O Ross; S K Evans; A P Salinger; J K Moore; J E Haber; V Lundblad
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mec1p associates with functionally compromised telomeres.

Authors:  Ronald E Hector; Alo Ray; Bo-Ruei Chen; Rebecca Shtofman; Kathleen L Berkner; Kurt W Runge
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Barlow; Michael Lisby; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Replisome function during replicative stress is modulated by histone h3 lysine 56 acetylation through Ctf4.

Authors:  Pierre Luciano; Pierre-Marie Dehé; Stéphane Audebert; Vincent Géli; Yves Corda
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress.

Authors:  Jérôme Poli; Olga Tsaponina; Laure Crabbé; Andrea Keszthelyi; Véronique Pantesco; Andrei Chabes; Armelle Lengronne; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Telomere length kinetics assay (TELKA) sorts the telomere length maintenance (tlm) mutants into functional groups.

Authors:  Linda Rubinstein; Lior Ungar; Yaniv Harari; Vera Babin; Shay Ben-Aroya; Gabor Merenyi; Lisette Marjavaara; Andrei Chabes; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mdt1 facilitates efficient repair of blocked DNA double-strand breaks and recombinational maintenance of telomeres.

Authors:  Brietta L Pike; Jörg Heierhorst
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  TopBP1/Dpb11 binds DNA anaphase bridges to prevent genome instability.

Authors:  Susanne M Germann; Vera Schramke; Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen; Irene Gallina; Nadine Eckert-Boulet; Vibe H Oestergaard; Michael Lisby
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 10.539

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.