Literature DB >> 16287629

The test-retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neurophysiological test battery: "neuromarker".

L M Williams1, E Simms, C R Clark, R H Paul, D Rowe, E Gordon.   

Abstract

NeuroMarker combines EEG and ERP measures with neurocognitive tests in a fully computerized and standardized testing system. It is designed for use across the lifespan and has a large normative database of over 1,000 subjects. This study was a preliminary evaluation of "NeuroMarker" in subjects spanning four decades. Twenty-one healthy subjects (12-57 years) were tested at baseline and four weeks later. From the "Neuromarker" battery, the authors analyzed EEG data (eyes open and closed) and ERPs elicited during auditory oddball (N100, P200, N200, P300) and working memory (P150, P300) tasks. Concomitant neuropsychological data, acquired using a touch-screen system, comprised measures of sensori-motor, attention, verbal, executive, and memory function. Test-retest data were examined using analyses of variance and correlational procedures (corrected for multiple comparisons), with parallel analyses of age. EEG data did not differ across sessions, and showed high test-retest reliability (.71-.95), particularly for theta and delta (>.85). ERP components also showed sound reliability, particularly for sites where components are maximal: fronto-central N100 (.76-.77), centro-parietal P300 (.78-.81) to oddball targets, N100 and P200 (.74-.86) to oddball non-targets, and P150 amplitude and latency (.84-.93) to working memory stimuli. Neuropsychological tests showed a similarly sound level of consistency (on average, .70), with the most consistent tests tapping simple motor function, estimated intelligence, switching of attention (Part 2), verbal interference response time and memory intrusions (.71-.89). Age and sex did not have a differential impact on reliability for EEG, ERP, or neuropsychology measures. These findings provide preliminary evidence that the "NeuroMarker" battery is reliable for test-retest assessments. The results suggest that the standardized approach has utility for providing sensitive clinical and treatment evaluations across age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287629     DOI: 10.1080/00207450590958475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  86 in total

1.  A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  J Cobb Scott; Georg E Matt; Kristen M Wrocklage; Cassandra Crnich; Jessica Jordan; Steven M Southwick; John H Krystal; Brian C Schweinsburg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Validation of a home environment test battery for supporting assessments in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Jerker Westin; Mauro Schiavella; Mevludin Memedi; Dag Nyholm; Mark Dougherty; Angelo Antonini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Glucose regulation and cognitive function after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Rachel Galioto; Michael L Alosco; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Gladys Strain; Michael Devlin; Ronald Cohen; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; John Gunstad
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Cognitive aging, executive function, and fractional anisotropy: a diffusion tensor MR imaging study.

Authors:  S M Grieve; L M Williams; R H Paul; C R Clark; E Gordon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Is the Alzheimer's disease cortical thickness signature a biological marker for memory?

Authors:  Edgar Busovaca; Molly E Zimmerman; Irene B Meier; Erica Y Griffith; Stuart M Grieve; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar; Leanne M Williams; Adam M Brickman
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  A negative association between brainstem pontine grey-matter volume, well-being and resilience in healthy twins

Authors:  Justine M. Gatt; Karen L.O. Burton; Kylie M. Routledge; Katrina L. Grasby; Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar; Stuart M. Grieve; Peter R. Schofield; Anthony W.F. Harris; C. Richard Clark; Leanne M. Williams
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  A negative association between brainstem pontine grey-matter volume, well-being and resilience in healthy twins.

Authors:  Justine M Gatt; Karen L O Burton; Kylie M Routledge; Katrina L Grasby; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar; Stuart M Grieve; Peter R Schofield; Anthony W F Harris; C Richard Clark; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 6.186

9.  COGNITION-CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT INTERACTIONS IN THE PREDICTION OF ANTIDEPRESSANT OUTCOMES IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER PATIENTS: RESULTS FROM THE iSPOT-D TRIAL.

Authors:  Shefali Miller; Lisa M McTeague; Anett Gyurak; Brian Patenaude; Leanne M Williams; Stuart M Grieve; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar; Amit Etkin
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  Patient reports of cognitive problems are not associated with neuropsychological test performance in bariatric surgery candidates.

Authors:  Sarah Garcia; Andrew Fedor; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Gladys Strain; Michael J Devlin; Ronald A Cohen; Robert H Paul; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; John Gunstad
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.