Literature DB >> 16287523

[Barriers in screening for cervical cancer].

Mette Marie Espersen1, Iben W Holten.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 25 percent of Danish women do not participate in the national cervical cancer screening programme. This study aims to identify and describe the barriers to participation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight focus groups were held with 48 women aged 23-39.
RESULTS: There is usually more than one reason for an individual woman's non-participation. The various barriers are often mutually reinforced. The study reveals seven general barriers: Insufficient and incorrect knowledge about screening and cervical cancer, Lack of understanding of why screening is relevant to the individual woman, The gynaecological examination, Fear of having cancer, Attitude towards seeing one's general practitioner, Practical circumstances that make participation difficult, Attitude towards screening. In general, women do not discuss cervical cancer screening with people close to them, but general practitioners seem to have a great potential to help them overcome the barriers. DISCUSSION: This study indicates that non-participation does not necessarily mean that the individual woman has made an informed choice. But since the individual woman often has more than one barrier towards screening, it is not an issue of information and knowledge alone. In order to increase compliance, efforts must be made to resolve as many of the seven barriers as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger        ISSN: 0041-5782


  4 in total

1.  Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.

Authors:  Mette Tranberg; Bodil Hammer Bech; Jan Blaakær; Jørgen Skov Jensen; Hans Svanholm; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mette Tranberg; Bodil Hammer Bech; Jan Blaakær; Jørgen Skov Jensen; Hans Svanholm; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Clinical performance and acceptability of self-collected vaginal and urine samples compared with clinician-taken cervical samples for HPV testing among women referred for colposcopy. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dorthe Ørnskov; Kirsten Jochumsen; Pernille Husted Steiner; Ivan Moulun Grunnet; Annemette Wildfang Lykkebo; Marianne Waldstrøm
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Women's perspectives on illness when being screened for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lise Hounsgaard; Mikaela Augustussen; Helle Møller; Stephen K Bradley; Suzanne Møller
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.228

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.