Literature DB >> 16287201

Sample size calculations for disease freedom and prevalence estimation surveys.

Adam J Branscum1, Wesley O Johnson, Ian A Gardner.   

Abstract

We developed a Bayesian approach to sample size calculations for studies designed to estimate disease prevalence that uses a hierarchical model for estimating the proportion of infected clusters (cluster-level prevalence) within a country or region. The clusters may, for instance, be villages within a region, cities within a state, or herds within a country. Our model allows for clusters with zero prevalence and for variability in prevalences among infected clusters. Moreover, uncertainty about diagnostic test accuracy and within-cluster prevalences is accounted for in the model. A predictive approach is used to address the issue of sample size selection in human and animal health surveys. We present sample size calculations for surveys designed to substantiate freedom of a region from an infectious agent (disease freedom surveys) and for surveys designed to estimate cluster-level prevalence of an endemic disease (prevalence estimation surveys). In disease freedom surveys, for instance, assuming the cluster-level prevalence for a particular infectious agent in the region is greater than a maximum acceptable threshold, a sample size combination consisting of the number of clusters sampled and number of subjects sampled per cluster can be determined for which authorities conducting the survey detect this excessive cluster-level prevalence with high predictive probability. The method is straightforward to implement using the Splus/R library emBedBUGS together with WinBUGS. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16287201     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the sensitivity of faecal sampling for detection of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium and other Salmonella in cattle and pigs.

Authors:  M E Arnold; R J Gosling; F Martelli; D Mueller-Doblies; R H Davies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.434

2.  Risk-targeted selection of agricultural holdings for post-epidemic surveillance: estimation of efficiency gains.

Authors:  Ian G Handel; Barend M de C Bronsvoort; John F Forbes; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sample size estimation to substantiate freedom from disease for clustered binary data with a specific risk profile.

Authors:  P Kostoulas; S S Nielsen; W J Browne; L Leontides
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.434

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.