Literature DB >> 16287132

Impact of nutrition support on treatment outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: a secondary analysis of RTOG trial 90-03.

Rachel Rabinovitch1, Barbara Grant, Brian A Berkey, David Raben, Kie Kian Ang, Karen K Fu, Jay S Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the relationship between nutrition support (NS) on host toxicity and cancer outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing definitive radiotherapy (XRT).
METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90-03, a prospective randomized trial evaluating four definitive XRT fractionation schedules in patients with locally advanced HNSCC, which prospectively collected data on NS delivered before treatment (BNS), during treatment (TNS), and after definitive XRT. NS data and pretreatment characteristics of the 1073 evaluable patients were analyzed against therapy toxicity and outcome.
RESULTS: Patients receiving BNS experienced significantly less weight loss by the end of treatment and less grade 3 to 4 mucositis than patients not receiving BNS. However, patients receiving BNS had a poorer 5-year actuarial locoregional control rate than patients receiving TNS or no NS (29%, 55%, and 57%, respectively, p < .0001) and a poorer 5-year overall survival rate (16%, 36%, and 49%, respectively, p < .0001). Patients receiving BNS were significantly more likely to have a higher T classification, N status, and overall American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and initial presentation with greater pretreatment weight loss, and a poorer Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) than patients not receiving BNS. After adjusting for the impact of these prognostic factors through a recursive partition analysis, a multivariate analysis with a stratified Cox model found that BNS was still a highly significant independent prognostic factor for increased locoregional failure (hazards ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.79; p < .0001) and death (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.67; p < .0001).
CONCLUSION: In this study, the largest prospective evaluation of nutrition data in treated patients with cancer, BNS was associated with inferior treatment outcome in the patients with HNSCC undergoing XRT. These results should be considered hypothesis generating and encourage prospective clinical research and identification of the mechanisms underlying this finding. Copyright 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16287132     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  31 in total

Review 1.  One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour.

Authors:  Rebecca Harris; Ana Gamboa; Yvonne Dailey; Angela Ashcroft
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

Review 2.  Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 3.  Nutrition support and therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Arvin C Gee; Laszlo Kiraly; Mary S McCarthy; Robert Martindale
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Steven Kwasi Korang; Kirstine Halberg Engell; Marie Skøtt Nielsen; Kang Zhang; Maria Didriksen; Lisbeth Lund; Niklas Lindahl; Sara Hallum; Ning Liang; Wenjing Xiong; Xuemei Yang; Pernille Brunsgaard; Alexandre Garioud; Sanam Safi; Jane Lindschou; Jens Kondrup; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-19

5.  The impact of dietary regimen compliance on outcomes for HNSCC patients treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rafi Kabarriti; Amanda Bontempo; Maria Romano; Kevin P McGovern; Alyssa Asaro; Shankar Viswanathan; Shalom Kalnicki; Madhur K Garg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Nutritional interventions for cancer-induced cachexia.

Authors:  Norleena P Gullett; Vera C Mazurak; Gautam Hebbar; Thomas R Ziegler
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Weight loss as a prognostic factor for recurrence and survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Antuani Rafael Baptistella; Klisman Drescher Hilleshein; Caroline Beal; Juliana S Brambatti; Ruggero Caron; Shaline Ferla Baptistella; Radamés Ádamo Zuquello; Carina Rossoni; Gabriel Manfro
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05

Review 8.  The life experience of nutrition impact symptoms during treatment for head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Valentina Bressan; Annamaria Bagnasco; Giuseppe Aleo; Gianluca Catania; Milko P Zanini; Fiona Timmins; Loredana Sasso
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Patterns of prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients: a consideration of the significance of social support and practice variation.

Authors:  Julie L Locher; James A Bonner; William R Carroll; Jimmy J Caudell; Jeroan J Allison; Meredith L Kilgore; Christine S Ritchie; Gabriel S Tajeu; Ya Yuan; David L Roth
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Outcome after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and correlation with nutritional status in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Naumann; D Habermehl; T Welzel; J Debus; S E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.