Literature DB >> 16287057

Why carve up your continuous data?

Steven V Owen1, Robin D Froman.   

Abstract

Continuous data are commonplace in social, biophysical, and health research. For various reasons, researchers often carve up data into ordered chunks. Such data carving results in less information being carried by the data, a reduction or spurious increase in statistical power, and resultant Type I or Type II errors. We give examples of data carving in selected nursing literature, and illustrate how unnecessary categorization can produce erroneous statistical results. Finally, we propose credible alternatives to data carving.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287057     DOI: 10.1002/nur.20107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  11 in total

1.  Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion.

Authors:  Malcolm P Cutchin; Kathryn Remmes Martin; Steven V Owen; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Pooling dietary data using questionnaires with open-ended and predefined responses: implications for comparing mean intake or estimating odds ratios.

Authors:  Michael D Swartz; Michele R Forman; Somdat Mahabir; Carol J Etzel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Effects of pain controllability and discrepancy in social support on depressed mood among patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Sungkun Cho; Ira D Zunin; Puihan J Chao; Elaine M Heiby; James McKoy
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-09

4.  Druggable transcriptomic pathways revealed in Parkinson's patient-derived midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Mark van den Hurk; Shong Lau; Maria C Marchetto; Jerome Mertens; Shani Stern; Olga Corti; Alexis Brice; Beate Winner; Jürgen Winkler; Fred H Gage; Cedric Bardy
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2022-10-18

5.  Analysis of responder-based endpoints: improving power through utilising continuous components.

Authors:  James Wason; Martina McMenamin; Susanna Dodd
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Improving power in PSA response analyses of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer trials.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Martina McMenamin; Robert Chandler; Rakesh Heer; James M S Wason
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Why we should use simpler models if the data allow this: relevance for ANOVA designs in experimental biology.

Authors:  Stanley E Lazic
Journal:  BMC Physiol       Date:  2008-07-21

8.  Dental caries is negatively correlated with body mass index among 7-9 years old children in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Liang; Zhe-Qing Zhang; Ya-Jun Chen; Jin-Cheng Mai; Jun Ma; Wen-Han Yang; Jin Jing
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Ranking, selecting, and prioritising genes with desirability functions.

Authors:  Stanley E Lazic
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Perceptions of perioperative nursing competence: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Brigid M Gillespie; Emma B Harbeck; Karin Falk-Brynhildsen; Ulrica Nilsson; Maria Jaensson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2018-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.