Literature DB >> 16286927

Neural correlates of actual and predicted memory formation.

Yun-Ching Kao1, Emily S Davis, John D E Gabrieli.   

Abstract

We aimed to discover the neural correlates of subjective judgments of learning-whereby participants judge whether current experiences will be subsequently remembered or forgotten-and to compare these correlates to the neural correlates of actual memory formation. During event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants viewed 350 scenes and predicted whether they would remember each scene in a later recognition-memory test. Activations in the medial temporal lobe were associated with actual encoding success (greater activation for objectively remembered than forgotten scenes), but not with predicted encoding success (activations did not differ for scenes predicted to be remembered versus forgotten). Conversely, activations in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex were associated with predicted but not actual encoding success, and correlated with individual differences in the accuracy of judgments of learning. Activations in the lateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex were associated with both actual and predicted encoding success. These findings indicate specific dissociations and associations between the neural systems that mediate actual and predicted memory formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286927     DOI: 10.1038/nn1595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  42 in total

1.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Cameron B Jeter; Dongni Yang; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Perseverative interference with object-in-place scene learning in rhesus monkeys with bilateral ablation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Mark G Baxter; Philip G F Browning; Anna S Mitchell
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Is there more to metamemory? An argument for two specialized monitoring abilities.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; Tasnuva Enam; Kyle R Kraemer; Deborah K Eakin; Minjung Kim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

6.  Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning.

Authors:  Jarrod C Hines; Christopher Hertzog; Dayna R Touron
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Confidence of emotion expression recognition recruits brain regions outside the face perception network.

Authors:  Indrit Bègue; Maarten Vaessen; Jeremy Hofmeister; Marice Pereira; Sophie Schwartz; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The influence of parental history of Alzheimer's disease and apolipoprotein E epsilon4 on the BOLD signal during recognition memory.

Authors:  Guofan Xu; Donald G McLaren; Michele L Ries; Michele E Fitzgerald; Barbara B Bendlin; Howard A Rowley; Mark A Sager; Craig Atwood; Sanjay Asthana; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Ready...go: Amplitude of the FMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Chess Stetson; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Posterior midline and ventral parietal activity is associated with retrieval success and encoding failure.

Authors:  Sander M Daselaar; Steven E Prince; Nancy A Dennis; Scott M Hayes; Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.