Literature DB >> 16286587

Resting myocardial blood flow is impaired in hibernating myocardium: a magnetic resonance study of quantitative perfusion assessment.

Joseph B Selvanayagam1, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Italo Porto, David Sheridan, Adrian S H Cheng, Steffen E Petersen, Nick Searle, Keith M Channon, Adrian P Banning, Stefan Neubauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although impairment in perfusion reserve is well recognized in hibernating myocardium, there is substantial controversy as to whether resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) is reduced in such circumstances. Quantitative first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging allows absolute quantification of MBF. We hypothesized that MBF assessed at rest by quantitative CMR perfusion imaging is reduced in hibernating myocardium. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with 1 or 2-vessel coronary disease and at least 1 dysfunctional myocardial segment undergoing PCI were studied with preprocedure, early (24 hours), and late (9 months) postprocedure CMR imaging. First-pass perfusion images at rest were acquired in 3 short-axis planes by use of a T1-weighted turboFLASH sequence. In each slice, MBF was determined for 8 myocardial segments in mL . min(-1) . g(-1) by deconvolution of signal intensity curves with an arterial input function measured in the left ventricular blood pool. Cine MRI for assessment of global and segmental function and delayed enhancement MRI for detection of viability were also obtained. All coronary lesions were 80% to 95% stenosis in severity. Over all segments, mean MBF normalized by rate-pressure product ("corrected MBF") was 1.2+/-0.3 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in segments without significant coronary stenosis and 0.7+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in segments with coronary stenosis before PCI (mixed model controlling for slice and segment z=-23.9, P<0.001). Early after the procedure, the MBF was 1.2+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in revascularized segments and 1.3+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in nondiseased segments (z=-6.1, P<0.001). Late after PCI, the systolic wall thickening and end-diastolic wall thickness both increased significantly more (both P<0.001) in the myocardial segments subtended by severe coronary stenosis (8+/-17% to 40+/-19% and 6.5+/-1.1 to 9.3+/-2 mm, respectively) than in the myocardial segments supplied by nondiseased vessels. Mean MBF in dysfunctional segments with significantly improved contraction after revascularization was 0.8+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) before PCI and 1.2+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) after PCI (z=2.0, P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: CMR perfusion imaging detects impaired resting MBF in hibernating myocardial segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286587     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.549170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  38 in total

1.  Right and left ventricular myocardial perfusion reserves correlate with right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Jens Vogel-Claussen; Jan Skrok; Monda L Shehata; Sukhminder Singh; Christopher T Sibley; Danielle M Boyce; Noah Lechtzin; Reda E Girgis; Steven C Mathai; Thomas A Goldstein; Jie Zheng; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke; Paul M Hassoun
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Long-term preservation of myocardial energetic in chronic hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  Mohammad Nurulqadr Jameel; Qinglu Li; Abdul Mansoor; Qiang Xiong; Cory Swingen; Jianyi Zhang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Fourth annual Mario S. Verani, MD Memorial Lecture: noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease: changing roles, changing players.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance derived late microvascular obstruction assessment post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is the best predictor of left ventricular function: a comparison of angiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance derived measurements.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; Michael C H Leung; James D Richardson; Rishi Puri; Angela G Bertaso; Kerry Williams; Ian T Meredith; Karen S L Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Prognosis following acute myocardial infarction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kevin J Duffy; Victor A Ferrari
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Image of the month. Recovery of myocardial hibernation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Repetitive assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Frank Breuckmann; Kai Nassenstein; Jörg Barkhausen; Gerd Heusch; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to assessing myocardial viability.

Authors:  Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial contrast uptake and blood flow in patients affected with idiopathic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold; David C Sheridan; Jessica D Kushner; Deirdre Nauman; Donna Burgess; Diana Dutton; Rami Alharethi; Duanxiang Li; Ray E Hershberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion using CMR with a radial data acquisition: comparison with a dual-bolus method.

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nathan A Pack; Liyong Chen; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing.

Authors:  Anil K Attili; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.