Literature DB >> 16286456

Cellular trafficking and degradation of erythropoietin and novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP).

Alec W Gross1, Harvey F Lodish.   

Abstract

Erythropoietin (Epo) is essential for the production of mature red blood cells, and recombinant Epo is commonly used to treat anemia, but how Epo is degraded and cleared from the body is not understood. Glycosylation of Epo is required for its in vivo bioactivity, although not for in vitro receptor binding or stimulation of Epo-dependent cell lines; Epo glycosylation actually reduces the affinity of Epo for the Epo receptor (EpoR). Interestingly, a hyperglycosylated analog of Epo, called novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP), has a lower affinity than Epo for the EpoR but has greater in vivo activity and a longer serum half-life than Epo. We hypothesize that a major mechanism for degradation of Epo in the body occurs in cells expressing the Epo receptor, through receptor-mediated endocytosis of Epo followed by degradation in lysosomes, and therefore investigated the trafficking and degradation of Epo and NESP by EpoR-expressing cells. We show that Epo and NESP are degraded only by cultured cells that express the EpoR, and their receptor binding, dissociation, and trafficking properties determine their rates of intracellular degradation. Epo binds surface EpoR faster than NESP (k(on) = 5.0 x 10(8) m(-1) min(-1) versus 1.1 x 10(8) m(-1) min(-1)) but dissociates slower (k(off) = 0.029 min(-1) versus 0.042 min(-1)). Surface-bound Epo and NESP are internalized at the same rate (k(in) = 0.06 min(-1)), and after internalization 60% of each ligand is resecreted intact and 40% degraded. Our kinetic model of Epo and NESP receptor binding, intracellular trafficking, and degradation explains why Epo is degraded faster than NESP at the cellular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286456     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M510493200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  47 in total

Review 1.  Erythropoietin produced by the retina: its role in physiology and diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Cristina Hernández; Rafael Simó
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model-based comparability assessment of a recombinant human Epoetin Alfa and the Biosimilar HX575.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yan; Philip J Lowe; Martin Fink; Alexander Berghout; Sigrid Balser; Wojciech Krzyzanski
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 3.  Regulation of erythropoietin production.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jelkmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Simultaneous pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling of recombinant human erythropoietin upon multiple intravenous dosing in rats.

Authors:  Sihem Ait-Oudhia; Jean-Michel Scherrmann; Wojciech Krzyzanski
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Heparan Sulfate Regrowth Profiles Under Laminar Shear Flow Following Enzymatic Degradation.

Authors:  Kristina M Giantsos-Adams; Andrew Jia-An Koo; Sukhyun Song; Jiro Sakai; Jagadish Sankaran; Jennifer H Shin; Guillermo Garcia-Cardena; C Forbes Dewey
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Authors:  Sameer Doshi; Wojciech Krzyzanski; Susan Yue; Steven Elliott; Andrew Chow; Juan José Pérez-Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Glycosylation of therapeutic proteins: an effective strategy to optimize efficacy.

Authors:  Ricardo J Solá; Kai Griebenow
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.807

8.  Use of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic modelling for starting dose selection in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics.

Authors:  Balaji M Agoram
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Symmetric signaling by an asymmetric 1 erythropoietin: 2 erythropoietin receptor complex.

Authors:  Yingxin L Zhang; Mala L Radhakrishnan; Xiaohui Lu; Alec W Gross; Bruce Tidor; Harvey F Lodish
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Erythropoietin: a multimodal neuroprotective agent.

Authors:  Nadiya Byts; Anna-Leena Sirén
Journal:  Exp Transl Stroke Med       Date:  2009-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.