OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of perineural invasion (PNI) in the biopsy specimen on biochemical progression-free survival in hormone-naive patients with prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy. METHODS: A total of 512 consecutive hormone-naive patients (173 low risk, 212 intermediate risk, and 127 high risk) underwent brachytherapy for clinical Stage T1b-T2cNxM0 (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) prostate cancer. No patient underwent seminal vesicle or pathologic lymph node staging. All patients had undergone brachytherapy at least 3 years before analysis. The median follow-up was 5.3 years. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutpoint of 0.4 ng/mL or less after nadir and by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. PNI was defined as carcinoma tracking along, or around, a nerve within the perineural space. RESULTS: PNI was documented in 133 patients (26.0%). For both biochemical progression-free definitions, 94.0% and 94.9% of patients with and without PNI, respectively, remained free of biochemical progression. The median time to failure in patients with and without PNI was 17.2 and 17.9 months, respectively. For the biochemically disease-free cohort, the median posttreatment PSA level was less than 0.1 ng/mL. On univariate Cox regression analysis, the pretreatment PSA level, percentage of positive biopsies, prostate volume, and Gleason score predicted for biochemical outcome. PNI did not approach statistical significance (P = 0.671). On multivariate analysis, only pretreatment PSA (P < 0.001) and the percentage of positive biopsies (P < 0.001) maintained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In hormone-naive brachytherapy patients implanted with generous periprostatic treatment margins, the presence of PNI in the biopsy specimen did not adversely affect 8-year biochemical progression-free survival.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of perineural invasion (PNI) in the biopsy specimen on biochemical progression-free survival in hormone-naive patients with prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy. METHODS: A total of 512 consecutive hormone-naive patients (173 low risk, 212 intermediate risk, and 127 high risk) underwent brachytherapy for clinical Stage T1b-T2cNxM0 (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) prostate cancer. No patient underwent seminal vesicle or pathologic lymph node staging. All patients had undergone brachytherapy at least 3 years before analysis. The median follow-up was 5.3 years. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutpoint of 0.4 ng/mL or less after nadir and by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. PNI was defined as carcinoma tracking along, or around, a nerve within the perineural space. RESULTS: PNI was documented in 133 patients (26.0%). For both biochemical progression-free definitions, 94.0% and 94.9% of patients with and without PNI, respectively, remained free of biochemical progression. The median time to failure in patients with and without PNI was 17.2 and 17.9 months, respectively. For the biochemically disease-free cohort, the median posttreatment PSA level was less than 0.1 ng/mL. On univariate Cox regression analysis, the pretreatment PSA level, percentage of positive biopsies, prostate volume, and Gleason score predicted for biochemical outcome. PNI did not approach statistical significance (P = 0.671). On multivariate analysis, only pretreatment PSA (P < 0.001) and the percentage of positive biopsies (P < 0.001) maintained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In hormone-naive brachytherapy patients implanted with generous periprostatic treatment margins, the presence of PNI in the biopsy specimen did not adversely affect 8-year biochemical progression-free survival.
Authors: Piotr Zareba; Richard Flavin; Masis Isikbay; Jennifer R Rider; Travis A Gerke; Stephen Finn; Andreas Pettersson; Francesca Giunchi; Robert H Unger; Alex M Tinianow; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Robyn L Prueitt; Ming Yi; Robert S Hudson; Tiffany A Wallace; Tiffany M Howe; Harris G Yfantis; Dong H Lee; Robert M Stephens; Chang-Gong Liu; George A Calin; Carlo M Croce; Stefan Ambs Journal: Prostate Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Irwin H Lee; Rebecca Roberts; Rajal B Shah; Kirk J Wojno; John T Wei; Howard M Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-03-29 Impact factor: 7.038