Literature DB >> 16285217

Plan and operation of Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth.

Robert M Groves1, Grant Benson, William D Mosher, Jennifer Rosenbaum, Peter Granda, William Axinn, James Lepkowski, Anjani Chandra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This report describes how Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) was designed, planned, and implemented. The NSFG is a national survey of women and men 15-44 years of age designed to provide national estimates of factors affecting pregnancy and birth rates; men's and women's health; and parenting. Cycle 6, conducted in 2002, was the first time the NSFG included a sample of males.
METHODS: The survey used in-person, face-to-face interviews conducted by trained female interviewers. One person per household was interviewed from a national area probability sample in about 120 sample areas, with oversamples of teenagers, African Americans, and Hispanics. The data collection used computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). Separate questionnaires were used for female and male respondents. The last section of the questionnaires used a technique called audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). In order to control costs and nonresponse errors, survey managers statistically analyzed results from interviewers' visits to sampled households each day, and used those results to allocate interviewer labor and other resources more efficiently. This management improved response rates and made the sample more representative.
RESULTS: Over 12,500 interviews were completed, about 7,600 with females and about 4,900 with males. The response rate was about 80 percent for females and about 78 percent for males. The survey procedures were adapted during the fieldwork to achieve the desired response rates and to control costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16285217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1        ISSN: 0083-2014


  34 in total

1.  Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Michael R Kramer; Carol J Hogue
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Concurrent partnerships, nonmonogamous partners, and substance use among women in the United States.

Authors:  Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Eboni M Taylor; Maria R Khan; Robert J Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: the contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Lawrence B Finer; Susheela Singh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States.

Authors:  Sheela Kennedy; Larry Bumpass
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2008

5.  Coparenting and sexual partner concurrency among white, black, and Hispanic men in the United States.

Authors:  Eboni M Taylor; Frieda M Behets; Victor J Schoenbach; William C Miller; Irene A Doherty; Adaora A Adimora
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Social disadvantage as a risk for first pregnancy among adolescent females in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna K Upadhya; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Sexual orientation and related viral sexually transmitted disease rates among US women aged 15 to 44 years.

Authors:  Guoyu Tao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Responsive survey design, demographic data collection, and models of demographic behavior.

Authors:  William G Axinn; Cynthia F Link; Robert M Groves
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-08

9.  Neighborhood-level influences on young men's sexual and reproductive health behaviors.

Authors:  Laura D Lindberg; Mark Orr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Comparability of contraceptive prevalence etimates for women from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  John Santelli; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Lawrence B Finer; Vaughn I Rickert; Diana Bensyl; Sam Posner; Shelly Makleff; Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.