Literature DB >> 16285

The time and duration of meiosis.

M D Bennett.   

Abstract

Ever since meiosis was recognized as a process there has been a continuing interest in its temporal aspects. Two main types of meiotic timing experiments have been conducted: first, experiments to estimate the duration of meiosis (and sometimes its stages); second, experiments to locate the sensitive stage(s) when exposure of meiocytes to various treatments can affect meiotic chromosome behaviour (e.g. pairing or recombination). Such experiments have played an important role in increasing our understanding of the meiotic process. The duration of meiosis has been estimated in about 70 organisms, including two prokaryotes (yeast and Chlamydomonas) and the following eukaryotes: 1 Basidiomycete (Coprinus lagopus), 2 Gymnosperms (Larix decidua and Thuja plicata gracilis). at least 39 angiosperms, and at least 26 animal species. The duration of female meiosis has been estimated in far fewer species than male meiosis. However, estimates of the duration of female meiosis are available for 6 angiosperms. Drosophila melanogaster, Xenopus laevis, and several mammals. Comparison of these data shows that the duration of meiosis is one of the most variable aspects of the meiotic process, ranging from less than 6 h in yeast to more than 40 years in the human female. Developmental holds at different stages of meiosis are common in plants and animals, and inevitably prolong the meiotic division. However, even among species without developmental holds, the duration of meiosis is very variable. For instance, in animals it ranges from about 1-2 days in male Drosophila melanogaster to more than 24 days in male Homo sapiens and several Orthopterans. Despite the large variation in the duration of meiosis three generalizations can be made: (i) first prophase is always very long compared with the remaining meiotic stages, (ii) the rate of meiotic development is very slow compared with the rate of development in dividing somatic meristem cells of the same organisms under the same conditions, (iii) the duration of meiosis is characteristic of the genotype and species. Four main factors have been recognized which effect or determine the duration of meiosis, namely (1) environmental factors (e.g. temperature); (2) nuclear DNA content; (3) ploidy level of the organism; and, (4) the genotype. Because nuclear DNA content plays a major role in determining the duration of meiosis, it has been suggested that DNA influences the rate of meiotic development in two ways: first through its informational content (the genotype), and second indirectly by the physical and mechanical effects of its mass independently of its informational content (i.e. the nucleotype). Thus, the observed duration of meiosis is the result of a complex genotype-nucleotype-environment interaction. With the obvious exception of variation caused by developmental holds, changes in the duration of meiosis usually involve proportional changes in the durations of all its stages...

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 16285     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  30 in total

1.  Reversible and irreversible unfolding of mitotic newt chromosomes by applied force.

Authors:  M Poirier; S Eroglu; D Chatenay; J F Marko
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Can meristematic activity determine variation in leaf size and elongation rate among four Poa species? A kinematic study.

Authors:  F Fiorani; G T Beemster; L Bultynck; H Lambers
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  A guided tour of large genome size in animals: what we know and where we are heading.

Authors:  France Dufresne; Nicholas Jeffery
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Emergence and patterning of the five cell types of the Zea mays anther locule.

Authors:  Timothy Kelliher; Virginia Walbot
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 5.  The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype.

Authors:  Charles A Knight; Nicole A Molinari; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex.

Authors:  Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Plant genome horizons: Michael Bennett's contribution to genome research.

Authors:  I J Leitch; M F Fay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Plant genome values: how much do we know?

Authors:  M D Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  New insights into the role of the maize ameiotic1 locus.

Authors:  I Golubovskaya; N Avalkina; W F Sheridan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Meiosis: how could it work?

Authors:  N Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.