Literature DB >> 16284414

Dangerous phase.

Steven J Schiff1.   

Abstract

"Use a quiet reference." How many times have we heard this mantra during training or practice, interpreting electroencephalogram (EEG) tracings, or implanting intracranial electrodes? How many of us have used common reference EEG for synchrony studies in recent years? Far too many.Perhaps one source of this problem is the number 104. This is the relatively small number of citations to the reference Fein et al. (1988), which should have put to rest any further use of referential EEG for coherence measurements. And in retrospect, a more careful reading by us of Nunez's (1981) text would have instructed us not to do this. How such warnings have managed to escape integration into common knowledge and practice is troublesome. Electrical potentials are all measured with respect to other potentials. Technically, a potential difference is calculated by integrating the electrical field over a given path from one place to another in EEG terms, we mea sure a potential with respect to another potential, measured at one or more electrodes. All EEG potential measurements reflect the paths used to measure those potentials, and do not directly reflect localized regions of the brain beneath one electrode. Worse, in scalp EEG, the layers of cerebrospinal fluid, dura, skull, and scalp serve to smooth, filter, spread out, and redirect currents generated within the brain so that the measured scalp potentials bear a rather tenuous relationship to the underlying (presumably dipole) current sources. In calculating coherence, it is easy to show that if the potential differences are all made with respect to a common reference, then the amplitude of the reference can dominate the coherence estimate (Fein et al., 1988). In recent years, phase synchronization has been increasingly applied to analyze the dynamics of nonlinear systems (Pikovsky et al., 2000). In Guevara et al. (in this issue), we see the extension of Fein's results for phase coherency. The geometry of Fig. 1 in Guevara et al. should be imprinted on all of us the amplitude of a common reference can dominate the calculated phase syn chronization. There is far too much literature within the past decade that calculated phase synchronization from common referenced EEG. The good news is that the fix to remove common reference artifacts is simple. The bad news is that the interpretation of reference- free synchronization results from brain signals requires considerable caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284414      PMCID: PMC1469234          DOI: 10.1385/NI:3:4:315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroinformatics        ISSN: 1539-2791


  8 in total

1.  EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures.

Authors:  P L Nunez; R B Silberstein; Z Shi; M R Carpenter; R Srinivasan; D M Tucker; S M Doran; P J Cadusch; R S Wijesinghe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The effect of a scalp reference signal on coherence measurements of intracranial electroencephalograms.

Authors:  H P Zaveri; R B Duckrow; S S Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Modification of the average reference montage: dynamic average reference.

Authors:  Elena V Orekhova; B Gunnar Wallin And; Anders Hedström
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Phase synchronization measurements using electroencephalographic recordings: what can we really say about neuronal synchrony?

Authors:  Ramón Guevara; José Luis Pérez Velazquez; Vera Nenadovic; Richard Wennberg; Goran Senjanovic; Luís Garcia Dominguez
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

5.  A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies.

Authors:  O Bertrand; F Perrin; J Pernier
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-11

Review 6.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales.

Authors:  P L Nunez; R Srinivasan; A F Westdorp; R S Wijesinghe; D M Tucker; R B Silberstein; P J Cadusch
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-11

7.  Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects.

Authors:  G Fein; J Raz; F F Brown; E L Merrin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-06

8.  Decreased neuronal synchronization during experimental seizures.

Authors:  Theoden I Netoff; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Synchrony in normal and focal epileptic brain: the seizure onset zone is functionally disconnected.

Authors:  Christopher P Warren; Sanqing Hu; Matt Stead; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Mark R Bower; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  New happenings at the NIH.

Authors:  David N Kennedy
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2008-07-06

3.  Decrease in early right alpha band phase synchronization and late gamma band oscillations in processing syntax in music.

Authors:  María Herrojo Ruiz; Stefan Koelsch; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Visualizing dynamical neural assemblies with a fuzzy synchronization clustering analysis.

Authors:  Shu Zhou; Yan Wu; Claudia C Dos Santos
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2009-12

Review 5.  Connectivity measures applied to human brain electrophysiological data.

Authors:  R E Greenblatt; M E Pflieger; A E Ossadtchi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Auditory event-related potentials and α oscillations in the psychosis prodrome: neuronal generator patterns during a novelty oddball task.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shiva Fekri; Shelly Ben-David; Cheryl M Corcoran; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 7.  Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Feature selection on movement imagery discrimination and attention detection.

Authors:  N S Dias; M Kamrunnahar; P M Mendes; S J Schiff; J H Correia
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Controversies in epilepsy: debates held during the Fourth International Workshop on Seizure Prediction.

Authors:  Mark G Frei; Hitten P Zaveri; Susan Arthurs; Gregory K Bergey; Christophe C Jouny; Klaus Lehnertz; Jean Gotman; Ivan Osorio; Theoden I Netoff; Walter J Freeman; John Jefferys; Gregory Worrell; Michel Le Van Quyen; Steven J Schiff; Florian Mormann
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 10.  Time domain measures of inter-channel EEG correlations: a comparison of linear, nonparametric and nonlinear measures.

Authors:  J D Bonita; L C C Ambolode; B M Rosenberg; C J Cellucci; T A A Watanabe; P E Rapp; A M Albano
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.