Literature DB >> 16284383

Explaining the socioeconomic variation in cancer risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.

Tonje Braaten1, Elisabete Weiderpass, Merethe Kumle, Eiliv Lund.   

Abstract

Associations between level of education and cancer risk is well supported by scientific evidence, but previous studies could only partly adjust for relevant confounding factors. In this article, we examined how risk of cancer varies with level of education and identified factors that explain this variation using data from a prospective cohort study, including 93,638 Norwegian women who responded to an extensive questionnaire in 1991/1992 or 1996/1997. A total of 3,259 incident primary invasive cancer cases were diagnosed during follow-up, which ended in December 2001. We used Cox proportional hazards model to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Besides a similar overall risk of female cancers by level of education, we observed differing risks between educational groups for cancers of the lung, breast, cervix, kidney, and skin melanoma. Women with >16 years of education had an increased risk of breast cancer (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79) and a decreased risk of lung cancer (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.70) and cervical cancer (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.85) compared with the lowest educated women (7-9 years). The middle educated (13-16 years) had the lowest risk of kidney cancer (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.71), whereas the risk of skin melanoma was highest among women with 10 to 12 years of education (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.05-2.24) compared with the lowest educated women. After multivariate adjustment for potential confounders related to level of education, the variation in cancer risk according to educational levels declined into nonsignificance for all these sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284383     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  25 in total

1.  Interaction of area-level socioeconomic status and UV radiation on melanoma occurrence in California.

Authors:  Christina A Clarke; Lisa M Moy; Susan M Swetter; John Zadnick; Myles G Cockburn
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Impact of lifestyle factors and nutrients intake on occurrence of gastrointestinal cancer in Tunisian population.

Authors:  Olfa Baroudi; Arij Ben Chaaben; Amel Mezlini; Amel Moussa; Ines Omrane; Irene Jilson; Amel Benammar-Elgaaied; Soufia Chabchoub
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-11

3.  Combining individual and aggregated data to investigate the role of socioeconomic disparities on cancer burden in Italy.

Authors:  Maura Mezzetti; Domenico Palli; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Educational differentials in cancer mortality and avoidable deaths in Lithuania, 2001-2009: a census-linked study.

Authors:  Domantas Jasilionis; Giedre Smailyte; Ieva Vincerzevskiene; Vladimir M Shkolnikov
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition.

Authors:  Gwenn Menvielle; Anton E Kunst; Carla H van Gils; Petra H Peeters; Hendriek Boshuizen; Kim Overvad; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjonneland; Silke Hermann; Rudolf Kaaks; Manuela M Bergmann; Anne-Kathrin Illner; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Franco Berrino; Amelia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Anne May; Evelyn Monninkhof; Tonje Braaten; Eiliv Lund; José Ramón Quirós; Eric J Duell; Maria-José Sánchez; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Signe Borgquist; Jonas Manjer; Kay Tee Khaw; Naomi E Allen; Gillian K Reeves; Véronique Chajes; Sabina Rinaldi; Nadia Slimani; Valentina Gallo; Paolo Vineis; Elio Riboli; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  How do women value work shortly after breast cancer surgery and are their valuations associated with being on sick leave?

Authors:  Lena-Marie Petersson; Marie I Nilsson; Kristina Alexanderson; Mariann Olsson; Agneta Wennman-Larsen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

7.  Socioeconomic status and lung cancer: unraveling the contribution of genetic admixture.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Steve Selvin; Margaret R Wrensch; Jennette D Sison; Helen M Hansen; Charles P Quesenberry; Michael F Seldin; Lisa F Barcellos; Patricia A Buffler; John K Wiencke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Evaluating environmental tobacco smoke exposure in a group of Turkish primary school students and developing intervention methods for prevention.

Authors:  Hasan C Ekerbicer; Mustafa Celik; Ekrem Guler; Mehmet Davutoglu; Metin Kilinc
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Education and risk of cancer in a large cohort of men and women in the United States.

Authors:  Traci Mouw; Annemarie Koster; Margaret E Wright; Madeleine M Blank; Steven C Moore; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Socio-economic status and overall and cause-specific mortality in Sweden.

Authors:  Marianne Weires; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Kristina Sundquist; Jan Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.