BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nodal metastases are indisputable determinants of prognosis for colon and rectal cancer. Using classical histological criteria, many attempts to predict nodal metastasis have failed, preventing the adequate management of stage I (pT1) cancer. We investigated the role of tumour matrilysin in predicting metastatic potential, and discuss its potential use in individualising treatment of pT1 colon and rectal cancer. METHODS: The gene signature associated with nodal metastasis was investigated by cDNA array in 24 colon and rectal cancers. We studied 494 colon and rectal cancer patients to identify risk factors for nodal metastasis and evaluated the potential to predict nodal metastasis by either the logistic regression model or the Bayesian neural network model with built-in matrilysin. We then inferred possible causality of nodal metastasis from structural equation modelling. RESULTS: cDNA array revealed that matrilysin was maximally upregulated in the metastasis signature identified. Tumour matrilysin expression emerged as a stage independent risk factor for nodal metastasis, resulting in a similar predictive performance in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the two models. A Bayesian approach called automatic relevance determination identified matrilysin as one of the most relevant predictors examined. Structural equation modelling suggested possible direct causality between matrilysin and nodal metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided evidence that tumour matrilysin expression is a promising biomarker predicting nodal metastasis of colon and rectal cancer. Analysis of tumour matrilysin expression would help clinicians achieve the goal of individualised cancer treatment based on the metastatic potential of pT1 colon and rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nodal metastases are indisputable determinants of prognosis for colon and rectal cancer. Using classical histological criteria, many attempts to predict nodal metastasis have failed, preventing the adequate management of stage I (pT1) cancer. We investigated the role of tumourmatrilysin in predicting metastatic potential, and discuss its potential use in individualising treatment of pT1colon and rectal cancer. METHODS: The gene signature associated with nodal metastasis was investigated by cDNA array in 24 colon and rectal cancers. We studied 494 colon and rectal cancerpatients to identify risk factors for nodal metastasis and evaluated the potential to predict nodal metastasis by either the logistic regression model or the Bayesian neural network model with built-in matrilysin. We then inferred possible causality of nodal metastasis from structural equation modelling. RESULTS: cDNA array revealed that matrilysin was maximally upregulated in the metastasis signature identified. Tumourmatrilysin expression emerged as a stage independent risk factor for nodal metastasis, resulting in a similar predictive performance in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the two models. A Bayesian approach called automatic relevance determination identified matrilysin as one of the most relevant predictors examined. Structural equation modelling suggested possible direct causality between matrilysin and nodal metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided evidence that tumourmatrilysin expression is a promising biomarker predicting nodal metastasis of colon and rectal cancer. Analysis of tumourmatrilysin expression would help clinicians achieve the goal of individualised cancer treatment based on the metastatic potential of pT1colon and rectal cancer.
Authors: Wei Zhou; Steven N Goodman; Gennaro Galizia; Eva Lieto; Francesca Ferraraccio; Carlo Pignatelli; Colin A Purdie; Juan Piris; Robert Morris; David J Harrison; Philip B Paty; Al Culliford; Katharine E Romans; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Michael A Choti; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-01-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H C Crawford; B Fingleton; M D Gustavson; N Kurpios; R A Wagenaar; J A Hassell; L M Matrisian Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: H Nelson; N Petrelli; A Carlin; J Couture; J Fleshman; J Guillem; B Miedema; D Ota; D Sargent Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-04-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: T Brabletz; A Jung; S Reu; M Porzner; F Hlubek; L A Kunz-Schughart; R Knuechel; T Kirchner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-08-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: B J Druker; C L Sawyers; H Kantarjian; D J Resta; S F Reese; J M Ford; R Capdeville; M Talpaz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sean C Glasgow; Joshua I S Bleier; Lawrence J Burgart; Charles O Finne; Ann C Lowry Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Vanessa Almendro; Elisabet Ametller; Susana García-Recio; Olga Collazo; Ignasi Casas; Josep M Augé; Joan Maurel; Pedro Gascón Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fee Klupp; Lena Neumann; Christoph Kahlert; Johannes Diers; Niels Halama; Clemens Franz; Thomas Schmidt; Moritz Koch; Juergen Weitz; Martin Schneider; Alexis Ulrich Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Rebecca Reindel; Susan C Baker; Kwang-Youn Kim; Carol A Rowley; Stanford T Shulman; Jan M Orenstein; Elizabeth J Perlman; Mark W Lingen; Anne H Rowley Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.756