AIM: To elucidate the rate of non-response among diabetics (recently diagnosed in rural diabetic screening camps) who were referred for eye examination to detect diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: At diabetic retinopathy screening camps, all patients underwent dilated fundus examination using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 4,111 known diabetics, only 2231(55%) patients attended the diabetic retinopathy screening camps. Likewise, of the 1076 newly detected diabetics, only 125 (11.6%) attended the diabetic retinopathy screening camps. CONCLUSIONS: Non-response of such a magnitude calls for creating greater awareness among masses on diabetes and its microvascular complications. Second, conducting simultaneous diabetes screening and diabetic retinopathy screening camps could minimize the dropout rate.
AIM: To elucidate the rate of non-response among diabetics (recently diagnosed in rural diabetic screening camps) who were referred for eye examination to detect diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: At diabetic retinopathy screening camps, all patients underwent dilated fundus examination using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 4,111 known diabetics, only 2231(55%) patients attended the diabetic retinopathy screening camps. Likewise, of the 1076 newly detected diabetics, only 125 (11.6%) attended the diabetic retinopathy screening camps. CONCLUSIONS: Non-response of such a magnitude calls for creating greater awareness among masses on diabetes and its microvascular complications. Second, conducting simultaneous diabetes screening and diabetic retinopathy screening camps could minimize the dropout rate.
Authors: Mapa Mudiyanselage Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena; Gudlavalleti Venkata S Murthy; Jennifer L Y Yip; Clare Gilbert; Tunde Peto; Mahesh Premarathna; Maria Zuurmond Journal: Trop Med Health Date: 2019-05-17