Literature DB >> 16283815

Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination.

Silvia Geron1, Wasserstein Atalia.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the esthetic perception of men and women to variations in upper and lower gingival display at smile and speech and to incisal plane tilting. Composed photographs of smile and speech with varying amounts of gingival exposure of the upper and lower teeth and gingiva at smile and at speech and with varying degrees of incisal plane tilting were rated for attractiveness by two groups of lay people. The images were presented as male or female images. A total of 300 questionnaires, including 7500 images, were evaluated by 100 subjects. The results showed that images were scored as less attractive as the amount of upper and lower gingival display was increased during smile and speech. The amount of gingival exposure graded in the esthetic range was up to one mm for the upper incisors and zero mm for the lower incisors. Incisal plane tilting was graded as unesthetic when above two degrees of deviation from the horizontal. Male and female evaluators scored images differently with upper gingival exposure. Female evaluators gave statistically significant higher scores than male evaluators to upper gingival exposure images at smile and speech of both males and females, suggesting that females are more tolerant of upper gingival exposure. Images were scored differently when presented as male or female images. Female images were scored lower by both male and female evaluators, suggesting that additional efforts should be taken in female patients to achieve an esthetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283815     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[778:IOSOTP]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  34 in total

1.  Perception of esthetic orthodontic appliances: An eye tracking and cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Moritz Försch; Lena Krull; Marlene Hechtner; Roman Rahimi; Susanne Wriedt; Heiner Wehrbein; Cornelius Jacobs; Collin Jacobs
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Panel perception of facial appearance of cleft patients generated by use of a morphing technique.

Authors:  Vedat Yildirim; Alexander Hemprich; Martin Gründl; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-19

3.  Assessment of esthetic characteristics of the teeth and surrounding anatomical structures.

Authors:  Natalija Prica Oreški; Asja Čelebić; Nikola Petričević
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-03

4.  Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Anisha Janu; Aftab Azam; Ragni Tandon; Pratik Chandra; Rohit Kulshrestha; Vinay Umale
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Influence of facial type on attractiveness of vertical canine position from the perspective of orthodontists and laypeople.

Authors:  Yasemin Bahar Acar; Ece Abuhan; Rudi Boyacıyan; Fulya Özdemir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Effect of anterior teeth display during smiling on the self-perceived impacts of malocclusion in adolescents.

Authors:  Delcides Ferreira Paula; Érica Tatiane Silva; Ana Cristina Viana Campos; Margaret Olivera Nuñez; Cláudio Rodrigues Leles
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons.

Authors:  Catherine McLeod; H W Fields; Frank Hechter; William Wiltshire; Wellington Rody; James Christensen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effect of maxillary incisor labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position on smiling profile esthetics.

Authors:  Li Cao; Ke Zhang; Ding Bai; Yan Jing; Ye Tian; Yongwen Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Smile Attractiveness: Differences among the Perceptions of Dental Professionals and Laypersons.

Authors:  Abdullah Alper Öz; Berat Serdar Akdeniz; Erman Canlı; Samet Çelik
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  Smile esthetics from odontology students' perspectives.

Authors:  Pilar España; Beatriz Tarazona; Vanessa Paredes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.