Literature DB >> 16283312

Combination vinorelbine and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer using a non-body surface area dosing scheme.

Anne F Schott1, James M Rae, Kent A Griffith, Daniel F Hayes, Vered Sterns, Laurence H Baker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose of flat-dosed vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. At the time of study initiation, it was anticipated that vinorelbine would be developed as an oral capsule. A flat dosing scheme of both drugs was used to facilitate development of the oral regimen, and because neither drug's clearance is associated with body surface area (BSA), pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic endpoints were explored. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Capecitabine was administered orally at 3,000 mg/day on days 1-14. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 20 mg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The vinorelbine dose was escalated until dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were measured after the first dose. Patients underwent genotype analysis for polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 gene, and the erythromycin breath test (ERMBT), a phenotypic test of CYP3A enzyme activity.
RESULTS: Twenty five eligible patients were enrolled. Hematologic DLT was seen at the 50 and 45 mg vinorelbine doses; thus the recommended dose is 40 mg on days 1 and 8. Response rate was 30%, and disease stabilization rate was 64% (all dose levels included). Vinorelbine clearance was not associated with ERMBT, BSA, or age. CYP3A5 genotype in this small sample did not have an obvious relationship to clearance or toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: A non-BSA based dosing scheme of capecitabine and vinorelbine is safe and efficacious. BSA did not affect vinorelbine clearance. We recommend future studies with capecitabine and/or vinorelbine to compare the safety and efficacy of flat dosed versus BSA-dosed treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283312     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-005-0132-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  11 in total

Review 1.  Covariate pharmacokinetic model building in oncology and its potential clinical relevance.

Authors:  Markus Joerger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  OATP1B1 polymorphism as a determinant of erythromycin disposition.

Authors:  C S Lancaster; G H Bruun; C J Peer; T S Mikkelsen; T J Corydon; A A Gibson; S Hu; S J Orwick; R H J Mathijssen; W D Figg; S D Baker; A Sparreboom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Gender aspects of treatment and drug related toxicity in medical oncology.

Authors:  Christine Marosi
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  Optimized Dosing: The Next Step in Precision Medicine in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  René J Boosman; Jacobus A Burgers; Egbert F Smit; Neeltje Steeghs; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Rob Ter Heine
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Impact of pharmacogenetics on variability in exposure to oral vinorelbine among pediatric patients: a model-based population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Authors:  Mourad Hamimed; Pierre Leblond; Aurélie Dumont; Florence Gattacceca; Emmanuelle Tresch-Bruneel; Alicia Probst; Pascal Chastagner; Anne Pagnier; Emilie De Carli; Natacha Entz-Werlé; Jacques Grill; Isabelle Aerts; Didier Frappaz; Anne-Isabelle Bertozzi-Salamon; Caroline Solas; Nicolas André; Joseph Ciccolini
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 6.  Breath tests to phenotype drug disposition in oncology.

Authors:  Frans L Opdam; Anil S Modak; Hans Gelderblom; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  A Phase II trial of the combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine as second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines.

Authors:  George Orphanos; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Savvoula Malliou; George Ioannidis; Alexandros Ardavanis; Constantinos Kandylis; John Stavrakakis; Gerassimos Rigatos
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Comparison of toxicity and effectiveness between fixed-dose and body surface area-based dose capecitabine.

Authors:  Femke M de Man; G D Marijn Veerman; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Maarten J Deenen; Didier Meulendijks; Caroline M P W Mandigers; Marcel Soesan; Jan H M Schellens; Esther van Meerten; Teun van Gelder; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Evaluation of body-surface-area adjusted dosing of high-dose methotrexate by population pharmacokinetics in a large cohort of cancer patients.

Authors:  Usman Arshad; Max Taubert; Tamina Seeger-Nukpezah; Sami Ullah; Kirsten C Spindeldreier; Ulrich Jaehde; Michael Hallek; Uwe Fuhr; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Carolin Jakob
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Pharmacogenetics in breast cancer: steps toward personalized medicine in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Sarah Rofaiel; Esther N Muo; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2010-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.