Literature DB >> 16283296

Comparative analysis of transcriptional responses to saline stress in the laboratory and brewing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with DNA microarray.

T Hirasawa1, Y Nakakura, K Yoshikawa, K Ashitani, K Nagahisa, C Furusawa, Y Katakura, H Shimizu, S Shioya.   

Abstract

To construct yeast strains showing tolerance to high salt concentration stress, we analyzed the transcriptional response to high NaCl concentration stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using DNA microarray and compared between two yeast strains, a laboratory strain and a brewing one, which is known as a stress-tolerant strain. Gene expression dynamically changed following the addition of NaCl in both yeast strains, but the degree of change in the gene expression level in the laboratory strain was larger than that in the brewing strain. The response of gene expression to the low NaCl concentration stress was faster than that to the high NaCl concentration stress in both strains. Expressions of the genes encoding enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and energy production in both strains or amino acid metabolism in the brewing strain were increased under high NaCl concentration conditions. Moreover, the genes encoding sodium ion efflux pump and copper metallothionein proteins were more highly expressed in the brewing strain than in the laboratory strain. According to the results of transcriptome analysis, candidate genes for the creation of stress-tolerant strain were selected, and the effect of overexpression of candidate genes on the tolerance to high NaCl concentration stress was evaluated. Overexpression of the GPD1 gene encoding glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, ENA1 encoding sodium ion efflux protein, and CUP1 encoding copper metallothionein conferred high salt stress tolerance to yeast cells, and our selection of candidate genes for the creation of stress-tolerant yeast strains based on the transcriptome data was validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283296     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-0192-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Yeast translational response to high salinity: global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels.

Authors:  Daniel Melamed; Lilach Pnueli; Yoav Arava
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high concentrations of furfural is based on NADPH-dependent reduction by at least two oxireductases.

Authors:  Dominik Heer; Daniel Heine; Uwe Sauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The response to unfolded protein is involved in osmotolerance of Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Martin Dragosits; Johannes Stadlmann; Alexandra Graf; Brigitte Gasser; Michael Maurer; Michael Sauer; David P Kreil; Friedrich Altmann; Diethard Mattanovich
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Evolution of intraspecific transcriptomic landscapes in yeasts.

Authors:  Christian Brion; David Pflieger; Anne Friedrich; Joseph Schacherer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Application of universal stress proteins in probing the dynamics of potent degraders in complex terephthalate metagenome.

Authors:  Andreas N Mbah; Raphael D Isokpehi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Stress-Induced Perturbations.

Authors:  Hilal Taymaz-Nikerel; Ayca Cankorur-Cetinkaya; Betul Kirdar
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-18

7.  Analysis and effect of conventional flasks in shaking culture of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Masato Takahashi; Hideki Aoyagi
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Genome-wide identification of resistance genes and transcriptome regulation in yeast to accommodate ammonium toxicity.

Authors:  Wenhao Fu; Xiuling Cao; Tingting An; Huihui Zhao; Jie Zhang; Danqi Li; Xuejiao Jin; Beidong Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.547

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.