Literature DB >> 16283101

Diagnostic reference frames for seizures: A validation study.

J F van Ast1, W O Renier, J L Talmon, J M A Roos, A Hasman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We developed structured descriptions of signs and symptoms for specific seizure types (called Diagnostic Reference Frames-DRFs-by us) that can serve as a frame of reference in the process of classifying patients with epileptic seizures. In this study the validity of the DRFs for clinical use is evaluated and described.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study we use a decision support system based on the DRFs and using Bayes's rule for the validation of the DRFs. Patient's manifestations are entered in the decision support system and by successively applying Bayes's rule posterior probabilities are calculated. The DRFs with the highest posterior probability gives an indication of the classification of the seizure. The validation of the DRFs was performed by comparing the seizure type with the highest posterior probability with the classification of experienced epileptologists on a series of test cases with known epileptic seizures. In this way we assessed the accuracy of the DRFs in classifying patients with epileptic seizures.
RESULTS: We included sixty-six patients in this efficacy study. The patients and/or their relatives described the manifestations occurring during a seizure. Sixty cases (91%) were correctly classified using the decision support system. DISCUSSION: The accuracy of 91 % indicates that the knowledge encoded in the DRFs for the included seizure types is valid. The next step is to test the DRFs in a clinical setting to evaluate the applicability in daily practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283101     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  12 in total

1.  Rules for sequential diagnosis.

Authors:  A L Rector; E Ackerman
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1975-04

2.  Sequential diagnosis by computer.

Authors:  G A Gorry; G O Barnett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Clinical and electroencephalographical classification of epileptic seizures.

Authors:  H Gastaut
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 4.  Incidence and prevalence studies in epilepsy and their methodological problems: a review.

Authors:  J W Sander; S D Shorvon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Reliability of the diagnosis of a first seizure.

Authors:  C A van Donselaar; A T Geerts; J Meulstee; J D Habbema; A Staal
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The MICROSTROKE expert system for stroke type diagnosis.

Authors:  K Spitzer; A Thie; L R Caplan; K Kunze
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Evaluation of Epilepsy Expert--a decision support system.

Authors:  L Korpinen; T Pietilä; J Peltola; M Nissilä; T Keränen; T Touvinen; B Falck; E S Petránek; H Frey
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. From the Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  Validation of a questionnaire for clinical seizure diagnosis.

Authors:  D C Reutens; R A Howell; K E Gebert; S F Berkovic
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Interobserver variability in the ILAE classification of seizures in childhood.

Authors:  J B Bodensteiner; R D Brownsworth; J R Knapik; M C Kanter; L D Cowan; A Leviton
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.