Literature DB >> 16282506

Use of complementary therapies among breast and prostate cancer patients during treatment: a multisite study.

D M Hann1, F Baker, C S Roberts, C Witt, J McDonald, M Livingston, J Ruiterman, R Ampela, C Crammer, O Kaw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the use of complementary therapies (CT) among breast and prostate cancer patients during active cancer treatment. The authors compared use and beliefs about the role of CT in cancer recovery.
METHODS: A self-report survey was completed by 126 breast cancer patients and 82 prostate cancer patients as part of a multisite research project. The self-report questionnaire inquired about the use of various CTs, sources of information about CT, reasons for using CT, beliefs about the benefits and risks of CT, demographic characteristics, and cancer treatment history.
RESULTS: Most of the respondents were older than 50 years, Caucasian, married, had attended or completed college, and were less than 1 year post-diagnosis. Prostate cancer patients were significantly older than the breast cancer patients (P < .001). Several differences emerged between the groups. Compared to the prostate cancer patients, significantly more of the breast cancer patients reported using CT because they wanted to reduce the risk of recurrence (P < .01), play a more active role in recovery (P < .01), help manage stress (P < .01), take a more holistic approach (P < .01), or boost the immune system (P < .01). More of the prostate cancer patients reported using CT to have more control of their recovery (P < .05). The 2 groups also differed significantly (P < .01) on several beliefs about the potential benefits and risks of using CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients in this study had used some form of CT since the time of their diagnosis. Differences among breast and prostate cancer patients with regard to their use of CT during cancer treatment should be considered by oncology professionals who are discussing this topic with their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16282506     DOI: 10.1177/1534735405282109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1534-7354            Impact factor:   3.279


  10 in total

1.  Intervention fidelity: aspects of complementary and alternative medicine research.

Authors:  Gwen Wyatt; Alla Sikorskii; Mohammad Hossein Rahbar; David Victorson; Lora Adams
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Prevalence and predictors of complementary therapy use in advanced-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Abigail M Gross; Qin Liu; Susan Bauer-Wu
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Widespread use of complementary and alternative medicine among non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.

Authors:  Sarah Rausch Osian; Alexis D Leal; Cristine Allmer; Matthew J Maurer; Grezegorz Nowakowski; David J Inwards; William R Macon; Shawna L Ehlers; George J Weiner; Thomas M Habermann; James R Cerhan; Carrie A Thompson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-06-27

4.  The benefits of prayer on mood and well-being of breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ellen G Levine; Caryn Aviv; Grace Yoo; Cheryl Ewing; Alfred Au
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Prevalence of the Use of Herbal Medicines among Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  John Baptist Asiimwe; Prakash B Nagendrappa; Esther C Atukunda; Mauda M Kamatenesi; Grace Nambozi; Casim U Tolo; Patrick E Ogwang; Ahmed M Sarki
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Use of Chinese medicine by cancer patients: a review of surveys.

Authors:  Bridget Carmady; Caroline A Smith
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 5.455

7.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Qianlai Luo; Gary N Asher
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 8.  The chiropractic profession: a scoping review of utilization rates, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and care provided.

Authors:  Peter J H Beliveau; Jessica J Wong; Deborah A Sutton; Nir Ben Simon; André E Bussières; Silvano A Mior; Simon D French
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-11-22

9.  Recruitment and early retention of women with advanced breast cancer in a complementary and alternative medicine trial.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; Gwen K Wyatt; Azfar-E-Alam Siddiqi; Deimante Tamkus
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  An analysis of news media coverage of complementary and alternative medicine.

Authors:  Billie Bonevski; Amanda Wilson; David A Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.