Literature DB >> 16281294

Entorhinal cortex lesions disrupt fear conditioning to background context but spare fear conditioning to a tone in the rat.

M Majchrzak1, B Ferry, A R Marchand, K Herbeaux, A Seillier, A Barbelivien.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the integrity of the entorhinal cortex (EC) is not required for simple contextual conditioning. In background contextual conditioning, i.e., when a phasic cue is present during training, the involvement of the EC is still a matter of debate. Therefore, the present work further examines whether the EC is required for background contextual conditioning using a tone as the phasic cue. Rats sustaining either excitotoxic lesions of the EC or sham-lesions were trained with one of two procedures differing with respect to the predictive value of the tone: a paired procedure in which the tone perfectly predicts shock occurrence and overshadows context, and an unpaired procedure in which the predictive value of the tone is reduced. Conditioned fear was assessed by freezing responses during conditioning, reexposure to the training context, and reexposure to the tone in a new context. Postshock freezing was reduced in rats with entorhinal lesions. In all rats trained with the paired procedure, freezing to the context was low and freezing to the tone was high, suggesting that the tone has overshadowed the context during the conditioning session. The reverse pattern was observed with the unpaired procedure in sham-operated rats. In rats with entorhinal lesions trained with the unpaired procedure, freezing responses to the context was markedly reduced. In a new context, however, entorhinal-lesioned rats showed higher freezing scores than those of sham-lesioned rats. Freezing to the tone was unaffected by the lesion irrespective of the tone's predictive value. As a whole, these results support the notion that the EC is required for normal background contextual freezing. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16281294     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  17 in total

1.  Fear conditioning is disrupted by damage to the postsubiculum.

Authors:  Siobhan Robinson; David J Bucci
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Enhanced metabolic capacity of the frontal cerebral cortex after Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  A K Bruchey; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Disconnection of the entorhinal cortex and dorsomedial striatum impairs the sensitivity to instrumental contingency degradation.

Authors:  Bjoern Lex; Wolfgang Hauber
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Context representations, context functions, and the parahippocampal-hippocampal system.

Authors:  Jerry W Rudy
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Therapeutic utility of non-peptidic CRF1 receptor antagonists in anxiety, depression, and stress-related disorders: evidence from animal models.

Authors:  John H Kehne; Christopher K Cain
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  Acute ethanol has biphasic effects on short- and long-term memory in both foreground and background contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Danielle Gulick; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Lesions of the entorhinal cortex or fornix disrupt the context-dependence of fear extinction in rats.

Authors:  Jinzhao Ji; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Lateral hypothalamic orexin neurons are critically involved in learning to associate an environment with morphine reward.

Authors:  Glenda C Harris; Mathieu Wimmer; Jovita F Randall-Thompson; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Muscarinic receptors in amygdala control trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Amber N Baysinger; Brianne A Kent; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.