Literature DB >> 16281243

Participant reactions to survey research in the general population after terrorist attacks.

Sandro Galea1, Arijit Nandi, Jennifer Stuber, Joel Gold, Ron Acierno, Connie L Best, Mike Bucuvalas, Sasha Rudenstine, Joseph A Boscarino, Heidi Resnick.   

Abstract

There remains concern that survey research after a disaster can precipitate or exacerbate distress among study participants. The authors surveyed 5,774 persons in three random-digit-dial telephone surveys of the general population of New York City conducted 1-2 months, 4-5 months, and 6-9 months after the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. Overall, 746 (12.9%) people who finished the surveys said that the survey questions were upsetting but only 57 (1.0% overall) were still upset at the end of the interview, and 19 (0.3%) wanted assistance from a counselor. Ten persons who did not finish the survey also received counselor assistance. Persons with mental health symptoms were more likely to find the survey questions emotionally upsetting as were participants who lacked salutary resources, including health insurance and a regular health care provider. Although relatively few of those interviewed found the survey assessment disturbing, the presence of a small number of respondents who wanted mental health assistance suggests the need for a mental health backup system for research conducted soon after exposure to large-scale traumatic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16281243     DOI: 10.1002/jts.20053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Stress        ISSN: 0894-9867


  7 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention using random-digit-dial recruitment: the Disaster Recovery Web project.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ruggiero; Heidi S Resnick; Lisa A Paul; Kirstin Gros; Jenna L McCauley; Ron Acierno; Mark Morgan; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Participation in a trauma-focused epidemiological investigation may result in sensitization for current health problems.

Authors:  Margot J Verschuur; Philip Spinhoven; Arnold A P van Emmerik; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Quality of life implications of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Authors:  Rebecca Anne Miksad; Kuan-Chi Lai; Thomas Benton Dodson; Sook-Bin Woo; Nathaniel Simon Treister; Omosalewa Akinyemi; Marian Bihrle; Guy Maytal; Meredith August; G Scott Gazelle; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-06

4.  Reactions to trauma research among women recently exposed to a campus shooting.

Authors:  Thomas A Fergus; Mandy M Rabenhorst; Holly K Orcutt; David P Valentiner
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2011-08-24

5.  Emotional risks to respondents in survey research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson; Michael Fendrich; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  The burden of research on trauma for respondents: a prospective and comparative study on respondents evaluations and predictors.

Authors:  Peter G van der Velden; Mark W G Bosmans; Annette C Scherpenzeel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The ethics of doing nothing. Suicide-bereavement and research: ethical and methodological considerations.

Authors:  P Omerov; G Steineck; K Dyregrov; B Runeson; U Nyberg
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 7.723

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.