Literature DB >> 1628121

The effects of hearing loss and age of intervention on some language metrics in young hearing-impaired children.

T W Ramkalawan1, A C Davis.   

Abstract

This study examined the oral language production abilities of a group of young children with bilateral sensorineural hearing impairments (greater than 25 dB HL). The effects of age of intervention-as indexed by age of detection, referral, first appointment and hearing-aid fitting-and of the severity of their hearing impairments on spoken language and communication were the foci of the study. Children were aged between 27 and 80 months with hearing threshold levels ranging from 32 to 98 dB in the better ear. All were audio- and video-taped in their own homes, in an unstructured play setting with the mother. Measures of expressive language ability were extracted including mean length of utterance, vocabulary size, words per min., total utterance attempts per min., proportion of non-verbal utterances and the proportion of questions asked by the child. No significant correlations were found between the children's hearing impairments and their scores on the language measures once age at interview had been statistically controlled. However, significant correlations were found between the language measures and the ages at which the children received intervention for their hearing impairments, in particular for vocabulary and those language measures denoting the rate and quality of the child's interaction during the episode recorded. This finding is consistent with some of the arguments to be found in the small body of data addressing the question of early intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1628121     DOI: 10.3109/03005369209077877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening.

Authors:  J Bamford; A Davis; J Boyle; J Law; S Chapman; S S Brown; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

3.  Costs of different strategies for neonatal hearing screening: a modelling approach.

Authors:  H C Boshuizen; G J van der Lem; M A Kauffman-de Boer; G A van Zanten; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; P H Verkerk
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Hearing impairment: a population study of age at diagnosis, severity, and language outcomes at 7-8 years.

Authors:  M Wake; Z Poulakis; E K Hughes; C Carey-Sargeant; F W Rickards
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences.

Authors:  Gary Rance
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M Richardson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H L van Straaten; R Bholasingh; G A van Zanten
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Grammatical outcomes of 3- and 6-year-old children who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Keegan M Koehlinger; Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing?

Authors:  C Robertson; S Aldridge; F Jarman; K Saunders; Z Poulakis; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response infant hearing screening method in at risk neonates.

Authors:  H L van Straaten; M E Groote; A M Oudesluys-Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.