Literature DB >> 16280844

Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review.

J C Thomas1, R T DeMarco, J M Donohoe, M C Adams, J C Pope, J W Brock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty, with specific focus on the presentation and management of failed pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who had undergone open dismembered pyeloplasty between 1998 and 2003. All patients with less than 6 months of followup were excluded from analysis. The patients were followed postoperatively with serial ultrasounds, with renograms reserved for those patients with prolonged, persistent or worsening hydronephrosis, or recurrent symptoms during followup.
RESULTS: A total of 105 pyeloplasties were performed in 103 patients (71 males and 32 females) 1 to 204 months old (mean 60), with an overall success rate of 93.3%. Followup ranged from 6 to 69 months (mean 23). The 7 patients with treatment failure were males 1 to 204 months old (mean 125), who presented most commonly with pain within 3 to 38 months (mean 13.1) after initial surgery. Subsequent ultrasound revealed worsening hydronephrosis, and renography in these patients showed a pattern consistent with obstruction. Five patients underwent initial balloon dilation, in which 1 was successful. In addition, 1 of these patients underwent an unsuccessful antegrade laser endopyelotomy. Six patients (86%) underwent open surgery, consisting of ureterocalicostomy in 3 and reoperative dismembered pyeloplasty in 3. Dense scarring was seen in all patients, 2 patients had a redundant pelvis causing kinking and 2 patients had unrecognized crossing vessels. Overall salvage rate was 100% with continued followup of 3 to 50 months (mean 18).
CONCLUSIONS: Dismembered pyeloplasty was successful in the vast majority of patients. In our series failures occurred as late as 3 years postoperatively, although most presented within 12 months of followup. Excluding routine postoperative nuclear renography did not seem to affect our ability to identify these cases. Although anatomical features such as renal pelvic size may have a role, failure is most likely secondary to technical issues, including missed crossing vessels and dependency of the anastomosis. In this series failed pyeloplasties did not respond well to balloon dilation, likely due to scar formation. Our current practice is to manage failures by open surgery, although endoscopic management by an incision may be an option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16280844     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000180420.11915.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Postoperative outcome following pyeloplasty in children using miniflank incision and transanastomotic stent: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Devendra K Gupta; Shilpa Sharma
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; Thomas S Lendvay; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Delayed redo pyeloplasty fails to recover lost renal function after failed pyeloplasty: early sonographic changes that correlate with a loss of differential renal function.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Chang Hee Hong; Young Jae Im; Yong Seung Lee; Sang Woon Kim; Sang Won Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Ye Wang; Benjamin I Chung; Richard S Lee; Michael P Kurtz; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  [Avoidance and management of complications in open surgical ureter reconstruction].

Authors:  D A Lazica; A S Brandt; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Dismembered pyeloplasty using double 'J' stent in infants and children.

Authors:  George K Ninan; Chandrasen Sinha; Ramnik Patel; Rajendra Marri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Long-term nephrostomy in an adult male spinal cord injury patient who had normal upper urinary tracts but developed bilateral hydronephrosis following penile sheath drainage: pyeloplasty and balloon dilatation of ureteropelvic junction proved futile: a case report.

Authors:  Subramanian Vaidyanathan; Bakul M Soni; Peter L Hughes; Gurpreet Singh; Paul Mansour; Tun Oo
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-12-16

Review 8.  Surgical options in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Douglas E Sutherland; Thomas W Jarrett
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty.

Authors:  George P Abraham; Avinash T Siddaiah; Krishnamohan Ramaswami; Datson George; Krishanu Das
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

10.  Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction.

Authors:  Alistair Rogers; Tahseen Hasan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.