PURPOSE: In this prospective study we evaluated the incidence of bladder perforation after transurethral bladder tumor resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients (33 male, 3 female, mean age +/- SD 65.6 +/- 11.43 [range 26 to 81]) with a solid mass in the bladder (mean 20.3 +/- 8.7 mm, range 5 to 40) were included in the study. Transurethral resections were performed with a 24Fr resectoscope. After the procedure an 18Fr Foley catheter was inserted into the bladder and 400 ml of 1/4 saline diluted contrast solution was instilled under gravity from 60 cm above the bladder. Complete filling and post-drainage radiographs were taken and examined for any evidence of extravasation. Regular evaluations with cystoscopy and ultrasound/computerized tomography were done to detect possible tumor recurrence and perivesical seeding. RESULTS: Histopathological examination of the tumors showed transitional cell carcinoma in 35 patients and chronic eosinophilic cystitis in 1. Review of the cystograms revealed various degrees of extraperitoneal contrast extravasation around the resected area in 21 patients (58.3%). The only statistically significant difference between patients with and without extravasation was in tumor size (logistic stepwise regression p = 0.030,) among factors tested including patient age and localization, number of foci, tumor grade and stage. No apparent clinical problems requiring medical or surgical intervention other than urethral catheterization developed and no evidence of extravesical tumor seeding as per ultrasound and/or computerized tomography was seen during a mean followup of 21.9 months (range 7 to 40). CONCLUSIONS: The extravasation of urine (asymptomatic perforation) after transurethral bladder tumor resection may occur much more frequently than believed or reported. It seems that this extravasation does not impose a significant risk of extravesical tumor seeding.
PURPOSE: In this prospective study we evaluated the incidence of bladder perforation after transurethral bladder tumor resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients (33 male, 3 female, mean age +/- SD 65.6 +/- 11.43 [range 26 to 81]) with a solid mass in the bladder (mean 20.3 +/- 8.7 mm, range 5 to 40) were included in the study. Transurethral resections were performed with a 24Fr resectoscope. After the procedure an 18Fr Foley catheter was inserted into the bladder and 400 ml of 1/4 saline diluted contrast solution was instilled under gravity from 60 cm above the bladder. Complete filling and post-drainage radiographs were taken and examined for any evidence of extravasation. Regular evaluations with cystoscopy and ultrasound/computerized tomography were done to detect possible tumor recurrence and perivesical seeding. RESULTS: Histopathological examination of the tumors showed transitional cell carcinoma in 35 patients and chronic eosinophilic cystitis in 1. Review of the cystograms revealed various degrees of extraperitoneal contrast extravasation around the resected area in 21 patients (58.3%). The only statistically significant difference between patients with and without extravasation was in tumor size (logistic stepwise regression p = 0.030,) among factors tested including patient age and localization, number of foci, tumor grade and stage. No apparent clinical problems requiring medical or surgical intervention other than urethral catheterization developed and no evidence of extravesical tumor seeding as per ultrasound and/or computerized tomography was seen during a mean followup of 21.9 months (range 7 to 40). CONCLUSIONS: The extravasation of urine (asymptomatic perforation) after transurethral bladder tumor resection may occur much more frequently than believed or reported. It seems that this extravasation does not impose a significant risk of extravesical tumor seeding.
Authors: Anthony M Esparaz; Jeffrey A Pearl; Brian R Herts; Justin LeBlanc; Baljendra Kapoor Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Jacob T Ark; Kirk A Keegan; Daniel A Barocas; Todd M Morgan; Matthew J Resnick; Chaochen You; Michael S Cookson; David F Penson; Rodney Davis; Peter E Clark; Joseph A Smith; Sam S Chang Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 5.588