Literature DB >> 16280754

Use of 2.6 ng/ml prostate specific antigen prompt for biopsy in men older than 60 years.

Robert B Nadler1, Stacy Loeb, Kimberly A Roehl, Jo Ann V Antenor, Scott Eggener, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test as an aid to early prostate cancer detection, using a cutoff of 4.0 ng/ml in 1994, this cutoff has been widely adopted to recommend prostate biopsy. There has been recent investigation into lowering the PSA prompt for biopsy, especially in men younger than 60 years. We determined how a lower cutoff would perform in men older than 60 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a prostate cancer screening study we studied 782 consecutive men who underwent prostate biopsy for PSA greater than 2.5 ng/ml or suspicious digital rectal examination. Biopsy results were evaluated as a function of patient age.
RESULTS: Clinical and pathological characteristics of cancers detected in the PSA range 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml were similar regardless of patient age. Overall PSA between 2.6 and 4.0 ng/ml was associated with a cancer detection rate of 16.2% using a sextant biopsy technique. PSA velocity was similar in men with prostate cancer in all age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: More than 15% of men with PSA 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml who are 40 years or older have prostate cancer detected with sextant needle biopsies. PSA velocity, tumor stage, Gleason grade and tumor volume were similar in all age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16280754     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181213.07447.8f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening and determining the appropriate prostate-specific antigen cutoff values.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Perioperative and continence outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy in elderly Indian men (≥70 years): A sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Narmada P Gupta; Emmanuel E Akpo; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer.

Authors:  C H Bangma; S Roemeling; F H Schröder
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Discrimination between the human prostate normal and cancer cell exometabolome by GC-MS.

Authors:  Ana Rita Lima; Ana Margarida Araújo; Joana Pinto; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Márcia Carvalho; Paula Guedes de Pinho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.